Author: Lai, Veronica Ka Wai; Lee, Anna; Leung, Patricia; Chiu, Chun Hung; Ho, Ka Man; Gomersall, Charles David; Underwood, Malcolm John; Joynt, Gavin Matthew
Title: Patient and family satisfaction levels in the intensive care unit after elective cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a preoperative patient education intervention Document date: 2016_6_22
ID: txfrcrub_11
Snippet: A sample size of 45 in each group will have 80% power to detect a difference in means of 10 points (the difference between mean control group satisfaction of 70 and a mean intervention group satisfaction of 80) assuming that the common SD is 16.6 (effect size of 0.60) using a two-group t-test with a 0.05 two-sided significance level. 6 We considered this moderate effect size as clinically important. Given that our fast-track failure rate in cardi.....
Document: A sample size of 45 in each group will have 80% power to detect a difference in means of 10 points (the difference between mean control group satisfaction of 70 and a mean intervention group satisfaction of 80) assuming that the common SD is 16.6 (effect size of 0.60) using a two-group t-test with a 0.05 two-sided significance level. 6 We considered this moderate effect size as clinically important. Given that our fast-track failure rate in cardiac surgery is ∼10%, we will recruit 100 patients for the study (50 patients in each group). A study of 100 is adequately powered to detect a decrease in anxiety (unadjusted mean difference of 2.7) score at day 7 after cardiac surgery (using the Chinese-Cantonese version of HADS 30 ) that was associated with a preoperative education intervention. 18 The sample size calculations were performed using nQuery Advisor V.7.0 (Statistical Solutions, Cork, Ireland).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- intervention group and moderate effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- intervention group and moderate effect size: 1
- intervention group satisfaction and mean difference: 1, 2
- intervention group satisfaction and sample size: 1
- mean difference and moderate effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- mean difference and moderate effect size: 1, 2
- mean difference and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44
- mean difference and sample size calculation: 1, 2, 3
- mean difference and score mean difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- mean difference and sided significance level: 1
- mean difference and significance level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- moderate effect and sample size: 1, 2, 3
- moderate effect and score mean difference: 1
- sample size and score mean difference: 1, 2, 3
- sample size and sided significance level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- sample size and significance level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
- sample size calculation and sided significance level: 1
- sample size calculation and significance level: 1, 2
- sided significance level and significance level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date