Author: Chan, Joseph M.; Rabadan, Raul
Title: Quantifying Pathogen Surveillance Using Temporal Genomic Data Document date: 2013_1_29
ID: u2t1x89m_26
Snippet: As a comparison to the q2 coefficient, we applied bar coding to determine the b 0 values of different influenza virus strains at filtration Hamming distances ranging from 0 to 200 (Fig. 4A) . This threshold is analogous to the R threshold of the q2 coefficient: 2 years of influenza virus evolution equivalent to 2 Ï« (5 Ï« 10 Ϫ3 ) Ï 1% genetic distance. We therefore considered b 0 at a Hamming distance of 1% of the length of HA, or roughly 17 nu.....
Document: As a comparison to the q2 coefficient, we applied bar coding to determine the b 0 values of different influenza virus strains at filtration Hamming distances ranging from 0 to 200 (Fig. 4A) . This threshold is analogous to the R threshold of the q2 coefficient: 2 years of influenza virus evolution equivalent to 2 Ï« (5 Ï« 10 Ϫ3 ) Ï 1% genetic distance. We therefore considered b 0 at a Hamming distance of 1% of the length of HA, or roughly 17 nucleotides, to be appropriate for comparison to the q2 coefficient (Fig. 4B) . For the most part, the q2 coefficient and b 0 are inversely correlated. For example, the low b 0 and high q2 coefficient of human H3N2, seasonal H1N1, and H1N1pdm indicate good surveillance. Non-H5N1 avian influenza virus has an extremely high b 0 and a low q2 coefficient. It should be noted that the non-H5N1 avian influenza virus data set contains 15 different HA subtypes, as opposed to all of the other single-subtype HA data sets considered. Thus, b 0 may need to be normalized by the expected number of HA subtypes. Nevertheless, b 0 for non-H5N1 avian influenza virus remains high even with normalization. However, as with p2, calculation of b 0 demands substantial computing power and time on the order of hours.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- data set and expected number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- data set and genetic distance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- data set and Hamming distance: 1
- data set and high remain: 1, 2
- data set and influenza virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- different HA subtype and HA subtype: 1
- different HA subtype and influenza virus: 1
- different influenza virus and HA subtype: 1
- different influenza virus and influenza virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75
- different influenza virus and influenza virus evolution: 1
- expected number and influenza virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- genetic distance and Hamming distance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- genetic distance and influenza virus: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date