Selected article for: "high flow and mechanical ventilation"

Author: Matthew J Cummings; Matthew R Baldwin; Darryl Abrams; Samuel D Jacobson; Benjamin J Meyer; Elizabeth M Balough; Justin G Aaron; Jan Claassen; LeRoy E Rabbani; Jonathan Hastie; Beth R Hochman; John Salazar-Schicchi; Natalie H Yip; Daniel Brodie; Max R O'Donnell
Title: Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study
  • Document date: 2020_4_20
  • ID: byh09alo_15
    Snippet: During hospitalization, 115 (45%), 12 (5%), and 3 (1%) of patients received respiratory support via non-rebreathing oxygen face mask, high-flow nasal cannula, and non-invasive ventilation, respectively ( Table 3) . Two-hundred-one patients (78%) received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for a median of 13 days (IQR 9-17). Survivors and non-survivors had a median of 14 (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) By April 14 th , 2020, 33% of patients .....
    Document: During hospitalization, 115 (45%), 12 (5%), and 3 (1%) of patients received respiratory support via non-rebreathing oxygen face mask, high-flow nasal cannula, and non-invasive ventilation, respectively ( Table 3) . Two-hundred-one patients (78%) received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for a median of 13 days (IQR 9-17). Survivors and non-survivors had a median of 14 (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) By April 14 th , 2020, 33% of patients (86/257) had died following a median of 8 days in hospital All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents