Author: I Nathaniel, Thomas; Goodwin, Richard L.; Fowler, Lauren; Mcphail, Brooks; Black, Asa C.
Title: An adaptive blended learning model for the implementation of an integrated medical neuroscience course during the Covidâ€19 pandemic Cord-id: 7k49to2s Document date: 2021_4_29
ID: 7k49to2s
Snippet: The implementation of an integrated medical neuroscience course by technologically pivoting an inâ€person neuroscience course to online using an adaptive blended method may provide a unique approach for teaching a medical neuroscience course during the Covidâ€19 pandemic. An adaptive blended learning method was developed in response to the requirements necessitated by the Covidâ€19 pandemic. This model combined pedagogical needs with digital technology using online learning activities to impl
Document: The implementation of an integrated medical neuroscience course by technologically pivoting an inâ€person neuroscience course to online using an adaptive blended method may provide a unique approach for teaching a medical neuroscience course during the Covidâ€19 pandemic. An adaptive blended learning method was developed in response to the requirements necessitated by the Covidâ€19 pandemic. This model combined pedagogical needs with digital technology using online learning activities to implement student learning in a medical neuroscience course for year one medical students. This approach provided medical students with an individually customized learning opportunity in medical neuroscience. The students had the complete choice to engage the learning system synchronously or asynchronously and learn neuroscience materials at different locations and times in response to the demands required to deal with the pandemic. Students’ performance in summative and formative examinations of the adaptive blended learning activities were compared with the previous performance obtained the previous year when the contents of the medical neuroscience course were implemented using the conventional “faceâ€toâ€face†learning approach. While the cohort of our students in 2019 and 2020 changed, the contents, sessions, volume of material and assessment were constant. This enabled us to compare the results of the 2019 and 2020 classes. Overall, students’ performance was not significantly different between the adaptive blended learning and the inâ€person approach. More students scored between 70â€79% during the adaptive blended learning compared with inâ€class teaching, while more students scored between 80â€89% during the inâ€person learning than during the adaptive blended learning. Finally, the percentage of students that scored >90% was not significantly different for both Years 2019 and 2020. The adaptive blended learning approach was effective in enhancing academic performance for high performing medical students. It also permitted the early identification of underachieving students, thereby serving as an early warning sign to permit timely intervention.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date