Author: Varghese, Merilyn S.; Liu, Chia-Liang; Kazi, Dhruv S.
Title: The Price of Progress: Cost, Access, and Adoption of Novel Cardiovascular Drugs in Clinical Practice Cord-id: u5wn7i6j Document date: 2021_10_1
ID: u5wn7i6j
Snippet: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The launch of new effective and safe cardiovascular drugs has produced large gains in health outcomes for several cardiovascular conditions. But this innovation comes at the cost of rapidly increasing pharmaceutical spending and high out-of-pocket costs. RECENT FINDINGS: In the USA, manufacturers are able to set prices according to what the market will bear rather than value to patients or society, with a complicated system of discounts and rebates obscuring the final price bo
Document: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The launch of new effective and safe cardiovascular drugs has produced large gains in health outcomes for several cardiovascular conditions. But this innovation comes at the cost of rapidly increasing pharmaceutical spending and high out-of-pocket costs. RECENT FINDINGS: In the USA, manufacturers are able to set prices according to what the market will bear rather than value to patients or society, with a complicated system of discounts and rebates obscuring the final price borne by payors. Some of these costs are passed on to patients in the form of co-payments or co-insurance, making these effective but high-cost medications unaffordable for many patients. Orphan drugs developed to treat rare diseases—for which manufactures are presented substantial financial and regulatory benefits—are particularly problematic, as they typically enter the market at very high prices compared with drugs for other indications. SUMMARY: Systematic cost-effectiveness analyses from the healthcare sector or societal perspectives can help identify the value-based price of a medication at market entry as well as later in the lifecycle of the drug when more data on effectiveness and safety becomes available. Despite bipartisan support, legislative progress on drug pricing has been slow. Clinicians should know the cost of the drugs they prescribe frequently, use generics where feasible, and regularly discuss out-of-pocket costs with patients to pre-empt cost-related non-adherence.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute risk and low density: 1, 2, 3
- absolute risk and low income: 1, 2, 3
- access ensure and additional testing: 1
- access ensure and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- access ensure and low income minority: 1
- access improve and additional testing: 1, 2, 3
- access improve and adherence initiation: 1
- access improve and adherence non: 1
- access improve and long term outcome: 1
- access improve and low cost alternative: 1
- access improve and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43
- access improve and low income group: 1
- access improve and low income minority: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date