Selected article for: "home work and logistic regression"

Author: Atchison, Christina J; Bowman, Leigh; Vrinten, Charlotte; Redd, Rozlyn; Pristera, Philippa; Eaton, Jeffrey W; Ward, Helen
Title: Perceptions and behavioural responses of the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of UK Adults
  • Cord-id: j7hih6o9
  • Document date: 2020_4_3
  • ID: j7hih6o9
    Snippet: Objective: To examine risk perceptions and behavioural responses of the UK adult population during the early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK. Design: A cross-sectional survey Setting: Conducted with a nationally representative sample of UK adults within 48 hours of the UK Government advising the public to stop non-essential contact with others and all unnecessary travel. Participants: 2,108 adults living in the UK aged 18 years and over. Data were collected between March 17 and 18 2020.
    Document: Objective: To examine risk perceptions and behavioural responses of the UK adult population during the early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK. Design: A cross-sectional survey Setting: Conducted with a nationally representative sample of UK adults within 48 hours of the UK Government advising the public to stop non-essential contact with others and all unnecessary travel. Participants: 2,108 adults living in the UK aged 18 years and over. Data were collected between March 17 and 18 2020. Main outcome measures: Descriptive statistics for all survey questions, including the number of respondents and the weighted percentages. Logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic variation in: (1) adoption of social-distancing measures, (2) ability to work from home, and (3) willingness and (4) ability to self-isolate. Results Overall, 1,992 (94.2%) respondents reported taking at least one preventive measure: 85.8% washed their hands with soap more frequently; 56.5% avoided crowded areas and 54.5% avoided social events. Adoption of social-distancing measures was higher in those aged over 70 compared to younger adults aged 18 to 34 years (aOR:1.9; 95% CI:1.1 to 3.4). Those with the lowest household income were six times less likely to be able to work from home (aOR:0.16; 95% CI:0.09 to 0.26) and three times less likely to be able to self-isolate (aOR:0.31; 95% CI:0.16 to 0.58). Ability to self-isolate was also lower in black and minority ethnic groups (aOR:0.47; 95% CI:0.27 to 0.82). Willingness to self-isolate was high across all respondents. Conclusions The ability to adopt and comply with certain NPIs is lower in the most economically disadvantaged in society. Governments must implement appropriate social and economic policies to mitigate this. By incorporating these differences in NPIs among socio-economic subpopulations into mathematical models of COVID-19 transmission dynamics, our modelling of epidemic outcomes and response to COVID-19 can be improved.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • action plan and lockdown continue: 1
    • action plan and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • activity relationship and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • adjust analysis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • adjusted odd and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • adjusted odd ratio and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • adjusted regression and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • adjusted regression and long significant: 1
    • adjusted regression and low compliance: 1
    • local network and logistic regression: 1
    • lockdown continue and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • lockdown measure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression and long significant: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • logistic regression and low compliance: 1, 2, 3, 4