Selected article for: "death endpoint and primary endpoint follow"

Author: Brunetti, Luigi; Diawara, Oumou; Tsai, Andrew; Firestein, Bonnie L.; Nahass, Ronald G.; Poiani, George; Schlesinger, Naomi
Title: Colchicine to Weather the Cytokine Storm in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19
  • Cord-id: qfckfxhk
  • Document date: 2020_9_14
  • ID: qfckfxhk
    Snippet: The repurposing of colchicine for the treatment of COVID-19 was suggested based in its immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and anti-viral properties. We performed a single-center propensity score matched cohort study, including all consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to a community hospital between 1 March 2020 and 30 May 2020. Patients were stratified according to the receipt of colchicine. The primary endpoint was defined as in-hospital death within 28-days follow-up. Secondary endpoints i
    Document: The repurposing of colchicine for the treatment of COVID-19 was suggested based in its immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and anti-viral properties. We performed a single-center propensity score matched cohort study, including all consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to a community hospital between 1 March 2020 and 30 May 2020. Patients were stratified according to the receipt of colchicine. The primary endpoint was defined as in-hospital death within 28-days follow-up. Secondary endpoints included favorable change in the Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement on days 14 and 28 versus baseline, proportion of patients not requiring supplemental oxygen on days 14 and 28, and proportion of patients discharged by day 28. In total data for 303 PCR positive COVID-19 patients were extracted and 66 patients were included in the 1:1 matched cohort study. At the end of the 28 day follow-up, patients receiving colchicine were approximately five times more likely to be discharged (odds ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.25–20.1; p = 0.023) and when comparing mortality, there were 3 deaths (9.1%) in patients receiving colchicine versus 11 deaths (33.3%) in the groups receiving standard of care (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.05–0.80; p = 0.023). These observations warrant further investigation in large controlled clinical trials.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • access program and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • activity limitation and acute respiratory: 1, 2
    • activity limitation and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • activity limitation and logistic regression calculate: 1
    • acute respiratory and additional evaluation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acute respiratory and additional organ support: 1
    • acute respiratory and administration safety: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory and administration safety support: 1
    • acute respiratory and loading dose: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • acute respiratory and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory and logistic regression calculate: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • additional evaluation and loading dose: 1
    • loading dose and logistic regression: 1, 2