Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, electrodesiccation, CO2 laser, and Er:YAG laser in the treatment of seborrheic keratosis.

Zaresharifi, Shirin; Robati, Reza M; Dadkhahfar, Sahar; Forouzanfar, Mohammad-Mehdi; Zaresharifi, Nooshin

BACKGROUND Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is a common benign skin epidermal lesion. Different treatment modalities have been proposed for this lesion. AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of electrodesiccation, cryotherapy, CO2 laser, and Er:YAG laser in the treatment of SK. METHODS The study was carried out on 30 patients each with four similar facial SKs. Each lesion was assigned to be treated with cryosurgery, electrodesiccation, CO2 laser, and Er:YAG laser in a random fashion. Therapeutic results were evaluated 8 weeks after the interventions through clinical and dermatoscopic assessment. Treatment improvement criteria for each lesion included the texture of the lesion, severity of the pigmentation, and an overall assessment of the healing. The severity of burning, pain, erythema, and the duration of the erythema after the procedures were documented. A survey of the patients' satisfaction with the treatments was also performed. RESULTS In the assessment of overall lesion healing by two dermatologists, the improvement rate was significantly higher in the CO2, Er:YAG lasers and electrodesiccation group compared to the cryotherapy (p <0.001). However, the CO2 and Er:YAG laser and the electrodesiccation groups showed no significant difference (p> 0.05). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in post-treatment pigmentation and texture between the groups (p> 0.05). The pain and burning severity after the interventions were negligible in all four groups. Prolonged erythema was not observed in any of the cases; however, the duration of erythema in the Er:YAG laser group was significantly longer (p <0.001). Patient satisfaction in the cryotherapy group was significantly lower than the other three groups (p <0.001). CONCLUSION The efficacy of treatment and patient satisfaction rate is highly comparable between electrodesiccation, CO2 laser, and Er:YAG laser but significantly higher than cryotherapy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.