Selected article for: "prospective real world study and real world study"

Author: Blanchard, A. C.; Desforges, M.; Labbe, A.-C.; Nguyen, C. T.; Petit, Y.; Besner, D.; Zinszer, K.; Seguin, O.; Laghdir, Z.; Adams, K.; Benoit, M.-E.; Leduc, G.; Longtin, J.; Ragoussis, I.; Buckeridge, D. L.; Quach, C.
Title: Evaluation of real-life use of Point-Of-Care Rapid Antigen TEsting for SARS-CoV-2 in schools for outbreak control (EPOCRATES)
  • Cord-id: 8jlfencz
  • Document date: 2021_10_14
  • ID: 8jlfencz
    Snippet: We evaluated the use of rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in school settings to determine RADT performance characteristics compared to PCR. Methods: We did a real-world, prospective observational cohort study where recruited high-school students and staff from two high-schools in Montreal (Canada) were followed from January 25th to June 10th, 2021. Twenty-five percent of asymptomatic participants were
    Document: We evaluated the use of rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in school settings to determine RADT performance characteristics compared to PCR. Methods: We did a real-world, prospective observational cohort study where recruited high-school students and staff from two high-schools in Montreal (Canada) were followed from January 25th to June 10th, 2021. Twenty-five percent of asymptomatic participants were tested weekly by RADT (nasal) and PCR (gargle). Class contacts of a case were tested. Symptomatic participants were tested by RADT (nasal) and PCR (nasal and gargle). The number of cases/outbreak and number of outbreaks were compared to other high schools in the same area. Results: Overall, 2,099 students and 286 school staff members consented to participate. The overall RADT specificity varied from 99.8 to 100%, with a lower sensitivity, varying from 28.6% in asymptomatic to 83.3% in symptomatic participants. The number of outbreaks was not different in the 2 participating schools compared to other high schools in the same area, but included a greater proportion of asymptomatic cases. Returning students to school after a 7-day quarantine, with a negative PCR on D6-7 after exposure, did not lead to subsequent outbreaks, as shown by serial testing. Of cases for whom the source was known, 37 of 57 (72.5%) were secondary to household transmission, 13 (25%) to intra-school transmission and one to community contacts between students in the same school. Conclusion: RADT did not perform well as a screening tool in asymptomatic individuals. Reinforcing policies for symptom screening when entering schools and testing symptomatic individuals with RADT on the spot may avoid subsequent significant exposures in class.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • active screening and local public health: 1
    • active screening and low proportion: 1, 2
    • active surveillance and additional case: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • active surveillance and additional school: 1
    • active surveillance and additional tool: 1
    • active surveillance and administrative personnel: 1
    • active surveillance and local public health: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • active surveillance and low proportion: 1
    • active surveillance and low sensitivity: 1
    • additional case and low proportion: 1, 2
    • additional case and low sensitivity: 1
    • additional school and local public health: 1
    • additional tool and local public health: 1, 2
    • additional tool and low sensitivity: 1
    • local public health and low sensitivity: 1