Author: Lara, Barbara A.; Torres, Francisco; Holger, Patricia; Perales, Claudia; Basauri, Sofia; Clausdorff, Hans; Escobedo, Ernesto; Saldias, Fernando; Swadron, Stuart; Aguilera, Pablo
Title: Clinical Prediction Tool to Assess the Likelihood of a Positive SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) Polymerase Chain Reaction Test in Patients with Flu-like Symptoms Cord-id: 6dxihz60 Document date: 2021_3_24
ID: 6dxihz60
Snippet: INTRODUCTION: The clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) overlaps with many other common cold and influenza viruses. Identifying patients with a higher probability of infection becomes crucial in settings with limited access to testing. We developed a prediction instrument to assess the likelihood of a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, based solely on clinical variables that can be determined within the time frame of an emergency department (ED) patient encount
Document: INTRODUCTION: The clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) overlaps with many other common cold and influenza viruses. Identifying patients with a higher probability of infection becomes crucial in settings with limited access to testing. We developed a prediction instrument to assess the likelihood of a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, based solely on clinical variables that can be determined within the time frame of an emergency department (ED) patient encounter. METHODS: We derived and prospectively validated a model to predict SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity in patients visiting the ED with symptoms consistent with the disease. RESULTS: Our model was based on 617 ED visits. In the derivation cohort, the median age was 36 years, 43% were men, and 9% had a positive result. The median time to testing from the onset of initial symptoms was four days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–5 days, range 0–23 days), and 91% of all patients were discharged home. The final model based on a multivariable logistic regression included a history of close contact (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29–4.7); fever (AOR 3.63, 95% CI, 1.931–6.85); anosmia or dysgeusia (AOR 9.7, 95% CI, 2.72–34.5); headache (AOR 1.95, 95% CI, 1.06–3.58), myalgia (AOR 2.6, 95% CI, 1.39–4.89); and dry cough (AOR 1.93, 95% CI, 1.02–3.64). The area under the curve (AUC) from the derivation cohort was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73–0.85) and AUC 0.7 (95% CI, 0.61–0.75) in the validation cohort (N = 379). CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a clinical tool to predict SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity in patients presenting to the ED to assist with patient disposition in environments where COVID-19 tests or timely results are not readily available.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abdominal pain and academic hospital: 1, 2
- abdominal pain and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- abdominal pain and logistic regression coefficient: 1
- abdominal pain and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- abdominal pain nausea and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
- abdominal pain nausea diarrhea and logistic regression: 1, 2
- abdominal pain nausea diarrhea vomiting and logistic regression: 1, 2
- abnormal chest and academic hospital: 1
- abnormal chest and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- abnormal chest and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- abnormal chest cxr and logistic regression: 1, 2
- abnormal cxr and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- academic hospital and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- academic hospital and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accuracy lack and logistic regression: 1
- ace inhibitor and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- ace inhibitor and logistic regression model: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date