Selected article for: "histidine residue and MERS cov"

Author: Lau, Susanna K. P.; Wong, Antonio C. P.; Lau, Terrence C. K.; Woo, Patrick C. Y.
Title: Molecular Evolution of MERS Coronavirus: Dromedaries as a Recent Intermediate Host or Long-Time Animal Reservoir?
  • Document date: 2017_10_16
  • ID: 1sq2uvur_24
    Snippet: The models of spike glycoprotein from each clade were built. It was observed that the amino acid substitutions observed by multiple alignments appeared to be randomly distributed throughout the structure (Figure 6 ). Based on the model, we did not observe specific evolutionary patterns of the MERS-CoV spike protein. However, intriguingly, the residue at position 1020 can distinguish between clade A and B (Figure 4 ). The glutamine (Q1020) and arg.....
    Document: The models of spike glycoprotein from each clade were built. It was observed that the amino acid substitutions observed by multiple alignments appeared to be randomly distributed throughout the structure (Figure 6 ). Based on the model, we did not observe specific evolutionary patterns of the MERS-CoV spike protein. However, intriguingly, the residue at position 1020 can distinguish between clade A and B (Figure 4 ). The glutamine (Q1020) and arginine residues (R1020) at that position are highly conserved in clade A and clade B, respectively, except for a histidine residue (H1020) found in 12 lineage B5 strains. Together with results from selective pressure analysis, this suggests that this amino acid residue may play a role during the molecular evolution of S protein of MERS-CoV and divergence of different lineages. 1224 and 1250 were also predicted to be positively selected sites among clade B strains by at least one method ( Table 2 ). In addition, codon 879 was predicted to be positively selected among clade A strains, whereas codons 312 and 1020 were predicted to be positively selected among clade B strains by at least one method (Table 2) . Furthermore, codons 1250 and 1020 were predicted to be positively selected among clade B3 and B5 strains, respectively, by MEME method (Table 2 ). However, none of these amino acid residues were within the receptor binding domain of MERS-CoV, suggesting that there has not been strong selective pressure at the receptor-binding interphase during virus evolution.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • amino acid and bind domain: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • amino acid and different lineage: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • amino acid and evolutionary pattern: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • amino acid and histidine residue: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • amino acid and meme method: 1
    • amino acid and MERS cov: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • amino acid residue and bind domain: 1, 2
    • amino acid residue and histidine residue: 1, 2
    • amino acid residue and MERS cov: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • amino acid residue role play and histidine residue: 1
    • amino acid residue role play and MERS cov: 1
    • amino acid substitution and arginine residue: 1
    • amino acid substitution and histidine residue: 1, 2, 3
    • amino acid substitution and MERS cov: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • arginine residue and histidine residue: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • arginine residue and MERS cov: 1
    • bind domain and MERS cov: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • different lineage and MERS cov: 1
    • evolutionary pattern and MERS cov: 1