Author: Todd, C. G.; Millman, S. T.; McKnight, D. R.; Duffield, T. F.; Leslie, K. E.
Title: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy for neonatal calf diarrhea complex: Effects on calf performance Document date: 2010_6_23
ID: 326huu05_43
Snippet: It should be noted that 4 highly influential observations were included in the final Cox proportional hazards model for time to weaning. Specifically, 2 MEL-treated and 2 PLA-treated calves experienced poor starter ration consumption and did not fulfill the weaning criteria by the conclusion of the 56-d observation period. Therefore, these calves were handled as censored animals in the weaning age analyses. During model validation, these censored.....
Document: It should be noted that 4 highly influential observations were included in the final Cox proportional hazards model for time to weaning. Specifically, 2 MEL-treated and 2 PLA-treated calves experienced poor starter ration consumption and did not fulfill the weaning criteria by the conclusion of the 56-d observation period. Therefore, these calves were handled as censored animals in the weaning age analyses. During model validation, these censored calves were identified as having a large impact on the regression coefficients of the final Cox proportional hazards model for time to weaning. Outliers and influential observations can be excluded from analysis, but only if appropriate justification can be provided. If these 4 calves were removed from the data set, the median time to weaning for MEL-and PLA-treated calves would be 40 and 46 d, respectively. Furthermore, treatment would be associated with a hazard ratio of 2.27, indicating that MEL treatment reduced time to weaning by 127%. However, a valid reason for excluding these data from analysis could not be identified. Thus, the 4 very influential calves were included in the final model for time to weaning, even though they may have masked some of the effect of MEL therapy.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- age analysis and data set: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- age analysis and final model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- age analysis and hazard ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- age analysis and large impact: 1
- age analysis and median time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46
- age analysis and model validation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- age analysis and observation period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- age analysis and proportional hazard: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
- age analysis and proportional hazard model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- age analysis and regression coefficient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- age analysis and time reduce: 1, 2
- age analysis and valid reason: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date