Author: Jalloh, Mohamed F; Li, Wenshu; Bunnell, Rebecca E; Ethier, Kathleen A; O’Leary, Ann; Hageman, Kathy M; Sengeh, Paul; Jalloh, Mohammad B; Morgan, Oliver; Hersey, Sara; Marston, Barbara J; Dafae, Foday; Redd, John T
Title: Impact of Ebola experiences and risk perceptions on mental health in Sierra Leone, July 2015 Document date: 2018_3_17
ID: 40ciukd7_16
Snippet: The data were analysed using SPSS V. 22 . Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed p-value less than 0.05. For reliability, internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's α values. For factorial validity, the factor structures of the PHQ-4 and IES-6 scales were examined with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The relationships between demographic variables (gender, age, education and region of residence), Ebola experien.....
Document: The data were analysed using SPSS V. 22 . Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed p-value less than 0.05. For reliability, internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's α values. For factorial validity, the factor structures of the PHQ-4 and IES-6 scales were examined with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The relationships between demographic variables (gender, age, education and region of residence), Ebola experience, perceived Ebola threat and mental health symptoms were examined. Frequencies, proportions, 95% CI of proportions, as well as χ 2 tests were generated to examine the relationships between sample characteristics and mental health symptoms. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between Ebola experience, perceived Ebola threat and mental health symptoms. We further examined the effect of Ebola experience, perceived Ebola threat and interaction between those two variables on mental health status by conducting a multivariable logistic regression controlling for potential confounders. To avoid multicollinearity, only composite scores were entered as predictors into the model. Sex, age, education and region were included because they have been associated with mental health symptoms in other studies. Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) were calculated to measure the CFA model. Weighted cell count, percentages and ORs with 95% CIs are presented in the logistic regression tables.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- binary logistic regression analysis and mental health status: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- binary logistic regression and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- binary logistic regression and mental health status: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- cell count and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- CFA confirmatory factor analysis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- CFA confirmatory factor analysis and mental health status: 1, 2, 3
- composite score and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- confirmatory factor analysis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- confirmatory factor analysis and mental health status: 1, 2, 3
- confirmatory factor and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- confirmatory factor and mental health status: 1, 2, 3, 4
- confirmatory factor and mental health symptom: 1
- demographic variable and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Ebola experience and logistic regression: 1, 2
- Ebola experience and mental health status: 1
- Ebola threat and logistic regression: 1
- factor structure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- factor structure and mental health status: 1
- factor structure and mental health symptom: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date