Selected article for: "confidence interval and intervention group"
Author: Opiyo, Newton; English, Mike
Title: In-service training for health professionals to improve care of seriously ill newborns and children in low-income countries
  • Document date: 2015_5_13
    • ID: 16b8drw2_91
    Snippet: In-service neonatal emergency care training versus standard care for healthcare professionals Group grades of evidence * The risk WITHOUT the intervention is based on the control group risk. The corresponding risk WITH the intervention (and the 95% confidence interval for the difference) is based on the overall relative effect (and its 95% confidence interval) †About the certainty of the evidence (GRADE). ¶ High: This research provides a very .....
    Document: In-service neonatal emergency care training versus standard care for healthcare professionals Group grades of evidence * The risk WITHOUT the intervention is based on the control group risk. The corresponding risk WITH the intervention (and the 95% confidence interval for the difference) is based on the overall relative effect (and its 95% confidence interval) †About the certainty of the evidence (GRADE). ¶ High: This research provides a very good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different# is low.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • good indication and likely effect good indication: 1
    • GRADE evidence and Group grade: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • GRADE evidence and healthcare professional: 1
    • GRADE evidence and intervention risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • GRADE evidence and likely effect: 1
    • GRADE evidence and relative effect: 1, 2, 3
    • GRADE evidence and standard care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51
    • Group grade and standard care: 1, 2, 3
    • healthcare professional and intervention risk: 1, 2
    • healthcare professional and likely effect: 1, 2
    • healthcare professional and relative effect: 1
    • healthcare professional and standard care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • intervention risk and likely effect: 1, 2
    • intervention risk and relative effect: 1, 2
    • intervention risk and standard care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • likely effect and relative effect: 1, 2
    • likely effect and standard care: 1
    • overall relative effect and relative effect: 1
    • relative effect and standard care: 1, 2, 3, 4