Author: Opiyo, Newton; English, Mike
Title: In-service training for health professionals to improve care of seriously ill newborns and children in low-income countries Document date: 2015_5_13
ID: 16b8drw2_91
Snippet: In-service neonatal emergency care training versus standard care for healthcare professionals Group grades of evidence * The risk WITHOUT the intervention is based on the control group risk. The corresponding risk WITH the intervention (and the 95% confidence interval for the difference) is based on the overall relative effect (and its 95% confidence interval) †About the certainty of the evidence (GRADE). ¶ High: This research provides a very .....
Document: In-service neonatal emergency care training versus standard care for healthcare professionals Group grades of evidence * The risk WITHOUT the intervention is based on the control group risk. The corresponding risk WITH the intervention (and the 95% confidence interval for the difference) is based on the overall relative effect (and its 95% confidence interval) †About the certainty of the evidence (GRADE). ¶ High: This research provides a very good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different# is low.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- confidence interval and intervention risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- confidence interval and likely effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- confidence interval and relative effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- confidence interval and standard care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- control group and healthcare professional: 1
- control group and intervention risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- control group and likely effect: 1, 2, 3
- control group and relative effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- control group and standard care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- control group risk and intervention risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- control group risk and standard care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- corresponding risk and intervention corresponding risk: 1
- corresponding risk and intervention risk: 1
- corresponding risk and standard care: 1
- difference confidence interval and intervention risk: 1, 2
- difference confidence interval and likely effect: 1
- difference confidence interval and relative effect: 1
- difference confidence interval and standard care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
- effect substantially different likelihood and likely effect good indication: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date