Author: Jartti, Tuomas; Smits, Hermelijn H.; Bønnelykke, Klaus; Bircan, Ozlem; Elenius, Varpu; Konradsen, Jon R.; Maggina, Paraskevi; Makrinioti, Heidi; Stokholm, Jakob; Hedlin, Gunilla; Papadopoulos, Nikolaos; Ruszczynski, Marek; Ryczaj, Klaudia; Schaub, Bianca; Schwarze, Jürgen; Skevaki, Chrysanthi; Stenberg-Hammar, Katarina; Feleszko, Wojciech
Title: Bronchiolitis needs a revisit: Distinguishing between virus entities and their treatments Document date: 2018_11_25
ID: 4svg09dt_14
Snippet: Apart from using merely clinical severity scores, attempts have been made in order to cluster acute bronchiolitis by phenotype. In 2016, four such phenotypes were introduced in two large multicenter studies: Profile A was characterized by RV etiology, history of wheezing, wheezing at presentation, eczema, and older age of the patient; profile B by RSV etiology, wheezing at presentation, but no history of wheezing or eczema; profile C was the most.....
Document: Apart from using merely clinical severity scores, attempts have been made in order to cluster acute bronchiolitis by phenotype. In 2016, four such phenotypes were introduced in two large multicenter studies: Profile A was characterized by RV etiology, history of wheezing, wheezing at presentation, eczema, and older age of the patient; profile B by RSV etiology, wheezing at presentation, but no history of wheezing or eczema; profile C was the most severely ill group, with a longer hospital stay and high probability of RSV infections and intensive care unit treatments; and profile D had the least severe illness, including non-wheezing children with a shorter length of hospitalization. 18 The heterogeneity apparent in the clinical profiles of the patients highlights the need for a more personalized approach in the diagnostics and management of this condition.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- clinical profile and intensive care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- clinical profile and intensive care unit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- clinical profile and intensive care unit treatment: 1, 2
- clinical profile and management diagnostic: 1, 2
- clinical severity score and hospital stay: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- clinical severity score and intensive care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- clinical severity score and intensive care unit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- condition management diagnostic and hospital stay: 1
- condition management diagnostic and intensive care: 1
- condition management diagnostic and intensive care unit: 1
- condition management diagnostic and management diagnostic: 1, 2, 3, 4
- high probability and hospital stay: 1, 2
- high probability and intensive care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
- high probability and intensive care unit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- high probability and intensive care unit treatment: 1
- high probability and management diagnostic: 1
- hospital stay and intensive care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- hospital stay and intensive care unit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- hospital stay and intensive care unit treatment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date