Author: Hascall, K.L.; Kass, P.H.; Saksen, J.; Ahlmann, A.; Scorza, A.V.; Lappin, M.R.; Marks, S.L.
Title: Prevalence of Enteropathogens in Dogs Attending 3 Regional Dog Parks in Northern California Document date: 2016_11_11
ID: 033w9hwq_19
Snippet: The frequency of detection of Giardia spp. via fecal flotation was significantly different between the university and commercial reference laboratories (P = .013). The university laboratory detected 13 additional positive samples that the commercial reference laboratory did not detect, whereas the commercial reference laboratory detected 3 positive samples that the university laboratory did not detect (Table S1 ). In addition, 11/27 dogs (41%) th.....
Document: The frequency of detection of Giardia spp. via fecal flotation was significantly different between the university and commercial reference laboratories (P = .013). The university laboratory detected 13 additional positive samples that the commercial reference laboratory did not detect, whereas the commercial reference laboratory detected 3 positive samples that the university laboratory did not detect (Table S1 ). In addition, 11/27 dogs (41%) that had Giardia cysts detected via fecal flotation, DFA, or both were negative on PCR. Five of the 11 dogs (46%) that were infected with Giardia and that were negative on PCR were positive on both flotation and DFA. Significant differences were also found when DFA results were compared to the commercial laboratory fecal flotation (P = .0016) and to PCR results (P = .014).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- fecal flotation and Giardia spp detection frequency: 1
- fecal flotation and positive sample: 1
- fecal flotation and reference laboratory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- fecal flotation and significant difference: 1
- Giardia infect and university laboratory: 1
- Giardia spp detection and reference laboratory: 1, 2
- Giardia spp detection and university laboratory: 1, 2
- Giardia spp detection frequency and reference laboratory: 1
- Giardia spp detection frequency and university laboratory: 1
- PCR result and positive sample: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
- PCR result and reference laboratory: 1, 2, 3
- PCR result and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- PCR result and university laboratory: 1
- positive sample and reference laboratory: 1, 2, 3, 4
- positive sample and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- positive sample and university laboratory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- reference laboratory and significant difference: 1, 2, 3
- reference laboratory and university laboratory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- significant difference and university laboratory: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date