Author: Gomez, D.E.; Arroyo, L.G.; Costa, M.C.; Viel, L.; Weese, J.S.
Title: Characterization of the Fecal Bacterial Microbiota of Healthy and Diarrheic Dairy Calves Document date: 2017_4_7
ID: 2vraae5h_21
Snippet: Twenty-two different phyla were identified, but Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria accounted for >88% of sequences (Fig 2) . Fusobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Verrucomicrobia were identified in healthy and diarrheic calves at >1% of the total number of sequences. Comparison between healthy calves from F1 and F2 identified a higher relative abundance of Fusobacteria (P = .044) and lower relative abundance of Proteobacteria (P = .044) in.....
Document: Twenty-two different phyla were identified, but Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria accounted for >88% of sequences (Fig 2) . Fusobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Verrucomicrobia were identified in healthy and diarrheic calves at >1% of the total number of sequences. Comparison between healthy calves from F1 and F2 identified a higher relative abundance of Fusobacteria (P = .044) and lower relative abundance of Proteobacteria (P = .044) in calves from F1. Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria also dominated the fecal microbiota of diarrheic calves (Fig 2) . On F1, diarrheic calves had a significantly lower relative abundance of Actinobacteria than did healthy calves from the same farm (P = .005). There were no differences in phyla between healthy and diarrheic calves on F2 (Table S1) .
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Actinobacteria relative abundance and relative abundance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- diarrheic calf and healthy calf: 1
- diarrheic healthy calf and healthy calf: 1
- fecal microbiota and relative abundance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date