Selected article for: "infection probability and low infection probability"

Author: Klotz, Lynn C.
Title: Comments on Fouchier’s Calculation of Risk and Elapsed Time for Escape of a Laboratory-Acquired Infection from His Laboratory
  • Document date: 2015_4_14
  • ID: 7lh8iqm1_1
    Snippet: I n a Letter to the Editor of mBio, Professor Ron Fouchier published a calculation (1) in which he finds a very low probability, P 1 , for a laboratory-acquired infection (LAI) for a single lab for a single year. Claiming numerous safety precautions in his biosafety level 3 (BSL3Ï©) laboratory, Fouchier calculates P 1 Ï­ 1 Ï« 10 -7 per person per year, and since there are 10 workers with access to his laboratory, P 1 Ï­ 1 Ï« 10 -6 per lab per yea.....
    Document: I n a Letter to the Editor of mBio, Professor Ron Fouchier published a calculation (1) in which he finds a very low probability, P 1 , for a laboratory-acquired infection (LAI) for a single lab for a single year. Claiming numerous safety precautions in his biosafety level 3 (BSL3Ï©) laboratory, Fouchier calculates P 1 Ï­ 1 Ï« 10 -7 per person per year, and since there are 10 workers with access to his laboratory, P 1 Ï­ 1 Ï« 10 -6 per lab per year. Compare this to P 1 Ï­ 2 Ï« 10 -3 per lab per year for BSL3 laboratories calculated from CDC statistics for undetected or unreported LAIs (2, 3), here called "community LAIs," as it is assumed that an undetected or unreported LAI represents an infection that has traveled outside the lab and into the community.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • low probability and single lab: 1
    • low probability and unreported undetected lai: 1