Author: Klotz, Lynn C.
Title: Comments on Fouchier’s Calculation of Risk and Elapsed Time for Escape of a Laboratory-Acquired Infection from His Laboratory Document date: 2015_4_14
ID: 7lh8iqm1_3
Snippet: Fouchier uses a simplistic formula, y Ï 1/P 1 , to calculate the elapsed time in years for an LAI to escape from his laboratory, y Ï 1/(1 Ï« 10 -6 ) Ï 1 Ï« 10 6 , that is, the million years stated in his Letter. It is not clear what this calculation tells us. Does it give us the elapsed time for a 10% chance that an LAI occurs? Does it give us elapsed time for a 50% chance, or an 80% chance? In this regard, the elapsed time for a 100% chance i.....
Document: Fouchier uses a simplistic formula, y Ï 1/P 1 , to calculate the elapsed time in years for an LAI to escape from his laboratory, y Ï 1/(1 Ï« 10 -6 ) Ï 1 Ï« 10 6 , that is, the million years stated in his Letter. It is not clear what this calculation tells us. Does it give us the elapsed time for a 10% chance that an LAI occurs? Does it give us elapsed time for a 50% chance, or an 80% chance? In this regard, the elapsed time for a 100% chance is infinite, as we can never be absolutely certain that an LAI will occur. I suggest attaching little weight to this elapsed time calculation and instead concentrating on risk Ï likelihood Ï« consequences, starting with the P 1 probability, specifically: potential pandemic fatalities Ï (probability of a community LAI) Ï« (probability that the community LAI leads to a pandemic) Ï« (estimated fatalities in a pandemic).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- laboratory escape and million year: 1
- LAI laboratory escape and million year: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date