Title: Proceedings 31st Symposium ESVN-ECVN Document date: 2019_12_21
ID: 4526ne4l_548
Snippet: The prevalence of intracranial disease in the examined population was 65.7% (266/405 cases). The overall sensitivity of the menace response was 34.6% (28.9â€40.6% p = 0.05). The overall specificity of the test was 76.3% (68.3â€83.1% p = 0.05). Subset analysis of test results in patients with intracranial lesions at MRI outlined how test characteristics change with neurolocalisation. Likelihood ratio analysis indicates that the menace response p.....
Document: The prevalence of intracranial disease in the examined population was 65.7% (266/405 cases). The overall sensitivity of the menace response was 34.6% (28.9â€40.6% p = 0.05). The overall specificity of the test was 76.3% (68.3â€83.1% p = 0.05). Subset analysis of test results in patients with intracranial lesions at MRI outlined how test characteristics change with neurolocalisation. Likelihood ratio analysis indicates that the menace response possesses little to no diagnostic value for lesions in the myelencephalon. It is of highest utility for multifocal lesions, and lesions in the forebrain, whereby a positive result is a useful indicator of a possible intracranial lesion. The postâ€test probability of forebrain and multifocal lesion diagnosis is increased by 15â€20%.We propose that an absent menace response is a practical indicator of intracranial disease, but that a normal menace response does not equivocally exclude intracranial pathology. We also propose that the diagnostic utility of the test result varies with intracranial neurolocalisation.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absent menace response and intracranial lesion: 1
- absent menace response and menace response: 1, 2, 3, 4
- absent menace response and multifocal lesion: 1
- diagnostic utility and high utility: 1, 2, 3
- diagnostic utility and menace response: 1, 2
- diagnostic utility and overall sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- diagnostic utility and overall specificity: 1, 2, 3, 4
- diagnostic utility and positive result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- diagnostic utility and test characteristic: 1
- diagnostic utility and test overall specificity: 1
- diagnostic utility and test result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- diagnostic value and examined population: 1
- diagnostic value and overall sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- diagnostic value and overall specificity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- diagnostic value and positive result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- diagnostic value and test characteristic: 1
- diagnostic value and test overall specificity: 1, 2
- diagnostic value and test result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- diagnostic value and useful indicator: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date