Selected article for: "evidence quality and meta analysis"

Author: Meng Lv; Mengshu Wang; Nan Yang; Xufei Luo; Wei Li; Xin Chen; Yunlan Liu; Mengjuan Ren; Xianzhuo Zhang; Ling Wang; Yanfang Ma; Junqiang Lei; Toshio Fukuoka; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Myeong Soo Lee; Zhengxiu Luo; Yaolong Chen; Enmei Liu; Jinhui Tian; Xiaohui Wang
Title: Chest Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Document date: 2020_4_17
  • ID: elwmqqqq_38
    Snippet: The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.14.20064733 doi: medRxiv preprint probability of consolidation, based on a meta-analysis of 42 studies, was 34% (95% CI, 0.23-0.45, I 2 = 95.80%). Fifty-one studies reported the probability of GGO with consolidation, which was estimated 48% (95% CI, 0.40-0.56, I 2 = 88.98%) in the meta-analysis. The quality of evidence for all three outco.....
    Document: The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.14.20064733 doi: medRxiv preprint probability of consolidation, based on a meta-analysis of 42 studies, was 34% (95% CI, 0.23-0.45, I 2 = 95.80%). Fifty-one studies reported the probability of GGO with consolidation, which was estimated 48% (95% CI, 0.40-0.56, I 2 = 88.98%) in the meta-analysis. The quality of evidence for all three outcomes was low ( Figure 5 ).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date