Selected article for: "image acquisition variability and measurement variability"
Title: 2018 ACVIM Forum Research Abstract Program: Seattle, Washington, June 14 - 15, 2018
  • Document date: 2018_10_25
    • ID: 60ceejq1_27
    Snippet: Evaluation of the left ventricular size by M-mode had the highest repeatability (CV = 8.8%) and lowest intra-and inter-observer variability for both image acquisition (CV = 9.3%) and measurement (CV = 4.3%) . Repeatability of 3DE image acquisition (CV = 21.1%) and measurement (CV = 8.6%) was slightly better than 2DE image acquisition (CV = 21.5%) and measurement (CV = 8.9%). The intraand inter-observer variability of 3DE (CV = 18.9%) was also sli.....
    Document: Evaluation of the left ventricular size by M-mode had the highest repeatability (CV = 8.8%) and lowest intra-and inter-observer variability for both image acquisition (CV = 9.3%) and measurement (CV = 4.3%) . Repeatability of 3DE image acquisition (CV = 21.1%) and measurement (CV = 8.6%) was slightly better than 2DE image acquisition (CV = 21.5%) and measurement (CV = 8.9%). The intraand inter-observer variability of 3DE (CV = 18.9%) was also slightly better than then 2DE (CV = 22.3%). 2DE left atrial to aortic ratio measurements had higher repeatability (CV = 9.0%) and less variability (CV = 9.5%) than volume assessed by 3DE image acquisition identified among the GFD dogs tested (11 taurine, 4 carnitine).

    Search related documents: