Author: Harris, John P; Lopman, Ben A; Cooper, Ben S; O'Brien, Sarah J
Title: Does spatial proximity drive norovirus transmission during outbreaks in hospitals? Document date: 2013_7_12
ID: 2rvdedui_61
Snippet: Sixty-five outbreaks contained complete data on both onset dates and ward position. We estimated the serial interval to be 1.86 days (95% confidence intervals 1.6-2.2 days), and with this value found strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that proximity was not significant (p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis using different values of the serial interval showed that there was evidence to reject the null hypothesis provided the assumed serial .....
Document: Sixty-five outbreaks contained complete data on both onset dates and ward position. We estimated the serial interval to be 1.86 days (95% confidence intervals 1.6-2.2 days), and with this value found strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that proximity was not significant (p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis using different values of the serial interval showed that there was evidence to reject the null hypothesis provided the assumed serial interval was less than 2.5 days.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- assumed serial interval and null hypothesis: 1, 2
- assumed serial interval and null hypothesis reject: 1
- assumed serial interval and null hypothesis reject evidence: 1
- assumed serial interval and sensitivity analysis: 1, 2
- assumed serial interval and serial interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- assumed serial interval and significant proximity null hypothesis: 1
- assumed serial interval and significant proximity null hypothesis reject: 1
- assumed serial interval and strong evidence: 1
- assumed serial interval and ward position: 1
- confidence interval and day confidence interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- confidence interval and different value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- confidence interval and null hypothesis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- confidence interval and null hypothesis reject: 1
- confidence interval and onset date: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- confidence interval and sensitivity analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- confidence interval and serial interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41
- confidence interval and strong evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- confidence interval and value find: 1, 2, 3
- day confidence interval and onset date: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date