Selected article for: "assumed serial interval and proximity value"
Author: Harris, John P; Lopman, Ben A; Cooper, Ben S; O'Brien, Sarah J
Title: Does spatial proximity drive norovirus transmission during outbreaks in hospitals?
  • Document date: 2013_7_12
    • ID: 2rvdedui_61
    Snippet: Sixty-five outbreaks contained complete data on both onset dates and ward position. We estimated the serial interval to be 1.86 days (95% confidence intervals 1.6-2.2 days), and with this value found strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that proximity was not significant (p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis using different values of the serial interval showed that there was evidence to reject the null hypothesis provided the assumed serial .....
    Document: Sixty-five outbreaks contained complete data on both onset dates and ward position. We estimated the serial interval to be 1.86 days (95% confidence intervals 1.6-2.2 days), and with this value found strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that proximity was not significant (p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis using different values of the serial interval showed that there was evidence to reject the null hypothesis provided the assumed serial interval was less than 2.5 days.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • null hypothesis reject evidence and serial interval: 1
    • null hypothesis reject evidence and significant proximity null hypothesis: 1
    • onset date and sensitivity analysis: 1, 2, 3
    • onset date and serial interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • onset date and strong evidence: 1, 2
    • sensitivity analysis and serial interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • sensitivity analysis and significant proximity null hypothesis: 1
    • sensitivity analysis and significant proximity null hypothesis reject: 1
    • sensitivity analysis and strong evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • sensitivity analysis and ward position: 1
    • serial interval and significant proximity null hypothesis: 1
    • serial interval and significant proximity null hypothesis reject: 1
    • serial interval and strong evidence: 1, 2
    • serial interval and ward position: 1
    • significant proximity null hypothesis and strong evidence: 1
    • significant proximity null hypothesis and ward position: 1
    • significant proximity null hypothesis reject and strong evidence: 1
    • significant proximity null hypothesis reject and ward position: 1
    • strong evidence and ward position: 1