Selected article for: "epitope prediction and linear epitope"

Author: Lundegaard, Claus; Lund, Ole; Kesmir, Can; Brunak, Søren; Nielsen, Morten
Title: Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations
  • Document date: 2007_12_15
  • ID: 5m269nzi_25
    Snippet: In the early 1980s, Hopp and Woods (Hopp and Woods, 1981, 1983 ) developed the first linear epitope prediction method. This method takes the assumption that the regions of proteins that have a high degree of exposure to solvent contain the antigenic determinants. According to the hydrophilicity scale generated by Levitt (1976) , Hopp and Woods (1981) assigned the hydrophilicity propensity to each amino acid in a sequence and looked at groups of s.....
    Document: In the early 1980s, Hopp and Woods (Hopp and Woods, 1981, 1983 ) developed the first linear epitope prediction method. This method takes the assumption that the regions of proteins that have a high degree of exposure to solvent contain the antigenic determinants. According to the hydrophilicity scale generated by Levitt (1976) , Hopp and Woods (1981) assigned the hydrophilicity propensity to each amino acid in a sequence and looked at groups of six residues. This gave promising results and a number of methods have since been developed with the aim of predicting linear epitopes using a combination of different amino acid propensities (Alix, 1999; Debelle et al., 1992; Jameson and Wolf, 1988; Maksyutov and Zagrebelnaya, 1993; Odorico and Pellequer, 2003; Parker et al., 1986) . , Pellequer et al. (1993 proposed an evaluation set containing 85 continuous epitopes in 14 proteins and found that the method based on turn propensity (i.e. the propensity of an amino acid to occur within a turn structure) had the highest sensitivity using this set. Seventy percent of the residues predicted to be in epitopes by this method were actually part of epitopes. The sensitivity for methods based on other propensities was in the range of 36-61% (Pellequer et al., 1991) . Analyzing the epitope regions in the Pellequer dataset reveals that almost all the hydrophobic amino acids are underrepresented, supporting the assumption that linear B-cell epitopes will occur in hydrophilic regions of the proteins.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • amino acid and continuous epitope: 1, 2, 3
    • amino acid and epitope region: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • amino acid and high degree: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • amino acid and high sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • amino acid and hydrophilic region: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • amino acid and hydrophilicity scale: 1
    • amino acid and hydrophobic amino acid: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • amino acid and linear epitope: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • amino acid and linear epitope prediction method: 1, 2, 3
    • amino acid and method epitope: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • amino acid propensity and hydrophilicity scale: 1
    • amino acid propensity and linear epitope: 1
    • antigenic determinant and linear epitope: 1
    • continuous epitope and linear epitope: 1, 2
    • epitope region and linear epitope: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • high degree and hydrophobic amino acid: 1
    • high degree and method epitope: 1, 2, 3
    • hydrophilicity propensity and linear epitope: 1
    • hydrophilicity scale and linear epitope: 1, 2