Selected article for: "BTM testing and cost effectiveness"

Author: ISODA, Norikazu; ASANO, Akihiro; ICHIJO, Michiru; OHNO, Hiroshi; SATO, Kazuhiko; OKAMOTO, Hirokazu; NAKAO, Shigeru; KATO, Hajime; SAITO, Kazuma; ITO, Naoki; USUI, Akira; TAKAYAMA, Hiroaki; SAKODA, Yoshihiro
Title: Assessment of the cost effectiveness of compulsory testing of introduced animals and bulk tank milk testing for bovine viral diarrhea in Japan
  • Document date: 2019_3_1
  • ID: 3ivoabj1_4
    Snippet: In the previous study, we developed a scenario tree model to propose efficient BVD control measures using the field data in Nemuro District, eastern part of Hokkaido, where cattle infected with BVDV had been reduced by interventions [19] . The scenario tree with some updates was used in this study to assess cost effectiveness of the BVD control measures, including compulsory testing of introduced animals, and BTM testing as mass screening methods.....
    Document: In the previous study, we developed a scenario tree model to propose efficient BVD control measures using the field data in Nemuro District, eastern part of Hokkaido, where cattle infected with BVDV had been reduced by interventions [19] . The scenario tree with some updates was used in this study to assess cost effectiveness of the BVD control measures, including compulsory testing of introduced animals, and BTM testing as mass screening methods to maintain BVD-free status or low BVD prevalence. The outputs obtained from the model indicated that compulsory testing of only heifers and/or non-vaccinated cattle, rather than all introduced animals, would be a cost-effective way to reduce BVD risk under various scenarios of vaccination coverage or BVDV prevalence and that BTM testing could successfully, but not completely, monitor non-introduced animals. In addition, continuous implementation of each control measure for 15 years was simulated to result in eradication of BVD in Japanese dairy farms.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • mass screening method and tree model: 1
    • mass screening method and vaccination coverage: 1
    • mass screening method BTM testing and non vaccinated cattle: 1
    • mass screening method BTM testing and previous study: 1
    • mass screening method BTM testing and scenario tree: 1
    • mass screening method BTM testing and tree model: 1
    • mass screening method BTM testing and vaccination coverage: 1
    • model obtain and previous study: 1
    • model obtain and tree model: 1
    • non vaccinated cattle and previous study: 1
    • non vaccinated cattle and scenario tree: 1
    • non vaccinated cattle and tree model: 1
    • non vaccinated cattle and vaccination coverage: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • previous study and scenario tree: 1, 2
    • previous study and tree model: 1, 2
    • previous study and vaccination coverage: 1, 2
    • scenario tree and tree model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • scenario tree and vaccination coverage: 1, 2
    • tree model and vaccination coverage: 1, 2