Selected article for: "generalized linear model and linear model"
Author: Liu, Keh-Sen; Yu, Tsung-Fu; Wu, Hsing-Ju; Lin, Chun-Yi
Title: The impact of global budgeting in Taiwan on inpatients with unexplained fever
  • Document date: 2019_9_13
    • ID: 432t0q7w_34
    Snippet: A generalized linear binary regression model was used for analysis. GB did not have a significant impact on the risk of being readmitted within 14 days (OR = 0.51; P = .24). There were no significant correlations between age, gender, income state index, or Charlson comorbidity index and the risk of readmission within 14 days (OR = 1.02, P = .28; OR = 0.98, P = .98; OR = 0.87, P = .54; OR = 0.55, P = .32, respectively). No significant differences .....
    Document: A generalized linear binary regression model was used for analysis. GB did not have a significant impact on the risk of being readmitted within 14 days (OR = 0.51; P = .24). There were no significant correlations between age, gender, income state index, or Charlson comorbidity index and the risk of readmission within 14 days (OR = 1.02, P = .28; OR = 0.98, P = .98; OR = 0.87, P = .54; OR = 0.55, P = .32, respectively). No significant differences in the risk of readmission within 14 days were noted between regional hospitals and medical centers or between local hospitals and medical centers (OR = 1.63, P = .46; OR = 2.84, P = .18, respectively). Compared with hospitals in Taipei city, there were no significant differences in the risk of being readmitted within 14 days among hospitals in northern Taiwan, central Taiwan, southern Taiwan, Kaoshiung city, or eastern Taiwan (OR = 0.39, P = .30; OR = 0.35, P = .20; OR = 2.98EÀ08, P = .99; OR = 1.31, P = .70; OR = 0.50, P = .55, respectively) ( Table 6 ).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • income state index and local hospital: 1
    • income state index and regional hospital: 1
    • Kaoshiung city and local hospital: 1
    • Kaoshiung city and regional hospital: 1
    • Kaoshiung city and significant correlation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • Kaoshiung city and significant impact: 1
    • Kaoshiung city and Taipei city: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • medical center and regional hospital: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • medical center and significant correlation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • medical center and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
    • medical center and significant impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • medical center and Taipei city: 1
    • medical center regional hospital and regional hospital: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • regional hospital and significant correlation: 1
    • regional hospital and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • regional hospital and significant impact: 1, 2
    • regional hospital and Taipei city: 1
    • significant correlation and Taipei city: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • significant impact and Taipei city: 1, 2