Selected article for: "group rate difference and rate difference"

Author: Lee, Su-Young; Lim, Hyeong-Seok
Title: The Effect of Having a Regular Doctor as a Primary Care Provider on Emergency Room Utilization in South Korea
  • Document date: 2017_11_14
  • ID: 03dy01zu_13
    Snippet: In the general population, the POMs of ER visit rates of the treatment and control groups were 7.2% and 7.6%, respectively. The group with a regular doctor had a 0.4% lower visit rate than the control group, but the difference in 95% CI between the groups was not statistically significant (ATE, -0.4%; P-value=0.619) ( Table 2 )......
    Document: In the general population, the POMs of ER visit rates of the treatment and control groups were 7.2% and 7.6%, respectively. The group with a regular doctor had a 0.4% lower visit rate than the control group, but the difference in 95% CI between the groups was not statistically significant (ATE, -0.4%; P-value=0.619) ( Table 2 ).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • control group and regular doctor: 1, 2, 3
    • control group and regular doctor group: 1, 2, 3
    • control group and visit rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • control group visit rate and regular doctor: 1, 2
    • control group visit rate and regular doctor group: 1, 2
    • control group visit rate and visit rate: 1, 2
    • control treatment and general population: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
    • control treatment and regular doctor: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • control treatment and regular doctor group: 1, 2, 3
    • control treatment and visit rate: 1, 2
    • control treatment group and general population: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • general population and regular doctor: 1
    • regular doctor and visit rate: 1, 2