Selected article for: "LR sensitivity and Specificity sensitivity"
Title: 10th Annual European College of Equine Internal Medicine Congress: 2—4 November, 2017
  • Document date: 2018_2_22
    • ID: zk6ttiq1_133
    Snippet: PP was significantly increased with AR compared to MR (mean difference [95% CI]: 119 [11-26] mmHg) and controls (118 [7-28] mmHg). Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and likelihood ratio (LR) of PP to distinguish AR from MR and controls were 82%, 73% and 3.1 at cutoff 48 mmHg and 49%, 98% and 25.4 at cutoff 58 mmHg. Sn, Sp and LR to differentiate severe from mild-moderate AR were 70%, 83% and 4.0 at cutoff 62 mmHg and 55%, 96% and 12.7 at cutoff .....
    Document: PP was significantly increased with AR compared to MR (mean difference [95% CI]: 119 [11-26] mmHg) and controls (118 [7-28] mmHg). Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and likelihood ratio (LR) of PP to distinguish AR from MR and controls were 82%, 73% and 3.1 at cutoff 48 mmHg and 49%, 98% and 25.4 at cutoff 58 mmHg. Sn, Sp and LR to differentiate severe from mild-moderate AR were 70%, 83% and 4.0 at cutoff 62 mmHg and 55%, 96% and 12.7 at cutoff 67 mmHg, respectively.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • likelihood ratio and LR likelihood ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • likelihood ratio and mean difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • likelihood ratio and Sn sensitivity: 1
    • likelihood ratio and specificity Sn sensitivity: 1
    • LR likelihood ratio and mean difference: 1, 2
    • LR likelihood ratio and Sn sensitivity: 1
    • LR likelihood ratio and specificity Sn sensitivity: 1