Author: Marty, Francisco M; Chemaly, Roy F; Mullane, Kathleen M; Lee, Dong-Gun; Hirsch, Hans H; Small, Catherine B; Bergeron, Anne; Shoham, Shmuel; Ljungman, Per; Waghmare, Alpana; Blanchard, Elodie; Kim, Yae-Jean; McKevitt, Matt; Porter, Danielle P; Jordan, Robert; Guo, Ying; German, Polina; Boeckh, Michael; Watkins, Timothy R; Chien, Jason W; Dadwal, Sanjeet S
Title: A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Study Evaluating Antiviral Effects, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Presatovir in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients with Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection of the Lower Respiratory Tract Document date: 2019_12_3
ID: sl45z4i0_18
Snippet: The primary analysis tested superiority of presatovir vs placebo using parametric analysis of covariance using baseline viral load and randomization stratification factors as covariates with a 2-sided α of 0.05 (Supplemental methods). Number of supplemental oxygen-free days was analyzed using a negative binomial model with stratification factors as covariates and an offset parameter to account for on-study duration. Patients who died prior to da.....
Document: The primary analysis tested superiority of presatovir vs placebo using parametric analysis of covariance using baseline viral load and randomization stratification factors as covariates with a 2-sided α of 0.05 (Supplemental methods). Number of supplemental oxygen-free days was analyzed using a negative binomial model with stratification factors as covariates and an offset parameter to account for on-study duration. Patients who died prior to day 28 or received supplemental oxygen on all days of the study period were assigned a value of 0 supplemental oxygen-free days. The proportion of patients developing respiratory failure of any cause requiring invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation through day 28 and allcause mortality through day 28 were analyzed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests adjusting for the stratification factors at the 2-sided 0.05-level, with 2-sided 95% exact confidence interval (CI) based on the Clopper-Pearson method for each treatment group. Where number of events was small, Fisher exact test was used.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- binomial model and confidence interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- binomial model and event number: 1
- binomial model and exact test: 1, 2, 3
- binomial model and Fisher exact test: 1
- binomial model and mechanical ventilation: 1, 2
- binomial model and primary analysis: 1
- binomial model and respiratory failure: 1, 2
- binomial model and study period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- binomial model and viral load: 1
- CI exact confidence interval and confidence interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- CI exact confidence interval and exact confidence interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- CI exact confidence interval and exact test: 1, 2
- CI exact confidence interval and study period: 1
- Clopper Pearson method and confidence interval: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date