Author: Cho, Yong-il; Yoon, Kyoung-Jin
Title: An overview of calf diarrhea - infectious etiology, diagnosis, and intervention Document date: 2014_3_19
ID: uxghqdei_27
Snippet: Laboratory methods for identifying enteric pathogens have typically included pathogen isolation and characterization along with histopathology as the gold standard for etiologic agent and disease confirmation [114] . However, many enteric pathogens are difficult to isolate from the gastrointestinal environment [31] . Direct visualization (e.g., light microscopy or electron microscopy [EM]) of pathogens in feces or intestinal contents as well as t.....
Document: Laboratory methods for identifying enteric pathogens have typically included pathogen isolation and characterization along with histopathology as the gold standard for etiologic agent and disease confirmation [114] . However, many enteric pathogens are difficult to isolate from the gastrointestinal environment [31] . Direct visualization (e.g., light microscopy or electron microscopy [EM]) of pathogens in feces or intestinal contents as well as the detection of antigens (e.g., Ag-ELISA) or nucleic acids (e.g., PCR) in specimens have been widely accepted as alternative methods. Most veterinary diagnostic laboratories concurrently use numerous techniques when testing samples for enteric pathogens. The characteristics along with advantages and disadvantages of common laboratory methods for identifying enteric pathogens are briefly described below and summarized in Table 1 .
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- alternative method and diagnostic laboratory: 1, 2
- alternative method and direct visualization: 1
- briefly describe and diagnostic laboratory: 1
- diagnostic laboratory and disease confirmation: 1
- diagnostic laboratory and etiologic agent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- direct visualization and etiologic agent: 1
- electron microscopy light microscopy and etiologic agent: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date