Selected article for: "different structure and secondary structure"

Author: Rahaman, Jordon; Siltberg-Liberles, Jessica
Title: Avoiding Regions Symptomatic of Conformational and Functional Flexibility to Identify Antiviral Targets in Current and Future Coronaviruses
  • Document date: 2016_11_9
  • ID: pygykil7_36
    Snippet: Viral proteins often possess multifunctionality, mediated by a conformational change in response to environment-specific factors (Xue et al. 2014) . Although conformational flexibility is important for function, it also offers flexibility in what sequence motifs are on display. If these sequences are rapidly diverging, different sequence motifs will be displayed, reinforcing the notion that flexible regions are potentially important in rewiring p.....
    Document: Viral proteins often possess multifunctionality, mediated by a conformational change in response to environment-specific factors (Xue et al. 2014) . Although conformational flexibility is important for function, it also offers flexibility in what sequence motifs are on display. If these sequences are rapidly diverging, different sequence motifs will be displayed, reinforcing the notion that flexible regions are potentially important in rewiring protein-protein interactions between virus and host (Gitlin et al. 2014) . Although most CoV proteins have almost no intrinsic disorder, several CoV protein families have homologous sites that display loop in some sequences, helix in others and strands in some (table 3, supplementary fig. S3 , Supplementary Material online). These sites are not necessarily disordered but they may be conformationally flexible in realtime (with secondary structure transitions in the same sequence, making them difficult to predict) or on evolutionary time-scales (so that different secondary structure elements actually are present in different sequences). The C(HS) and C(L) sites make up approximately 50-80% of most multiple sequence alignments. With the common expectation that protein structure is more conserved than sequence these numbers are surprisingly low. Neither PSIPRED nor JPred consistently predicts the same state for 20-50% of all sites in these multiple sequence alignments.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • conformational change and different sequence: 1
    • conformational change and host virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • conformational change and intrinsic disorder: 1
    • conformational change and protein protein: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • conformational change and protein structure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • conformational change and secondary structure: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • conformational change and sequence alignment: 1, 2, 3
    • conformational change and time scale: 1, 2
    • conformational change and viral protein: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
    • conformational flexibility and cov protein: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • conformational flexibility and flexible region: 1
    • conformational flexibility and host virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • conformational flexibility and intrinsic disorder: 1, 2
    • conformational flexibility and multiple sequence alignment: 1
    • conformational flexibility and multiple sequence alignment site: 1
    • conformational flexibility and protein family: 1
    • conformational flexibility and protein protein: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • conformational flexibility and protein protein interaction: 1
    • conformational flexibility and protein structure: 1, 2, 3