Author: Zijun Wang; Qi Zhou; Chenglin Wang; Qianling Shi; Shuya Lu; Yanfang Ma; Xufei Luo; Yangqin Xun; Weiguo Li; Muna Baskota; Yinmei Yang; Hui Zhai; Toshio Fukuoka; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Myeong Soo Lee; Zhengxiu Luo; Enmei Liu; Yaolong Chen
Title: Clinical Characteristics of Children with COVID-19: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis Document date: 2020_4_17
ID: jsjxdmi2_12
Snippet: Two reviewers (Q Zhou and Y Xun) assessed the quality of main evidence independently using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. We produced a "Summary of Findings" table using the GRADE pro software (24, 25). Direct evidence from RCTs is first set as high quality, and evidence from observational studies as low quality. Then initial quality can then be downgraded for five reasons (study limitations, c.....
Document: Two reviewers (Q Zhou and Y Xun) assessed the quality of main evidence independently using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. We produced a "Summary of Findings" table using the GRADE pro software (24, 25). Direct evidence from RCTs is first set as high quality, and evidence from observational studies as low quality. Then initial quality can then be downgraded for five reasons (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bias) and upgraded for three reasons (large magnitude of effect, dose-response relation and plausible confounders or biases) (26-31). Finally, the quality of main evidence can be classified as high, moderate, low, or very low, which reflects the extent to what we can be confident that the effect estimates are correct.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- direct evidence and dose response relation: 1
- direct evidence and effect large magnitude: 1
- direct evidence and Findings Summary table: 1
- direct evidence and grade tool: 1
- direct evidence and high quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- direct evidence and large magnitude: 1
- direct evidence and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- direct evidence and main evidence: 1, 2, 3
- direct evidence and main evidence quality: 1
- dose response and effect estimate: 1
- dose response and effect large magnitude: 1, 2
- dose response and Evaluation Development Recommendations Assessment grade tool: 1
- dose response and Findings Summary table: 1, 2
- dose response and grade tool: 1
- dose response and high quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- dose response and initial quality: 1
- dose response and large magnitude: 1, 2
- dose response and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- dose response relation and Evaluation Development Recommendations Assessment grade tool: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date