Selected article for: "dose response and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect"
Author: Zijun Wang; Qi Zhou; Chenglin Wang; Qianling Shi; Shuya Lu; Yanfang Ma; Xufei Luo; Yangqin Xun; Weiguo Li; Muna Baskota; Yinmei Yang; Hui Zhai; Toshio Fukuoka; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Myeong Soo Lee; Zhengxiu Luo; Enmei Liu; Yaolong Chen
Title: Clinical Characteristics of Children with COVID-19: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Document date: 2020_4_17
    • ID: jsjxdmi2_12
    Snippet: Two reviewers (Q Zhou and Y Xun) assessed the quality of main evidence independently using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. We produced a "Summary of Findings" table using the GRADE pro software (24, 25). Direct evidence from RCTs is first set as high quality, and evidence from observational studies as low quality. Then initial quality can then be downgraded for five reasons (study limitations, c.....
    Document: Two reviewers (Q Zhou and Y Xun) assessed the quality of main evidence independently using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. We produced a "Summary of Findings" table using the GRADE pro software (24, 25). Direct evidence from RCTs is first set as high quality, and evidence from observational studies as low quality. Then initial quality can then be downgraded for five reasons (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bias) and upgraded for three reasons (large magnitude of effect, dose-response relation and plausible confounders or biases) (26-31). Finally, the quality of main evidence can be classified as high, moderate, low, or very low, which reflects the extent to what we can be confident that the effect estimates are correct.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • direct evidence and publication bias indirectness imprecision: 1
    • direct evidence and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1
    • direct evidence and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1
    • dose response and publication bias indirectness: 1, 2
    • dose response and publication bias indirectness imprecision: 1, 2
    • dose response and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2
    • dose response and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
    • dose response relation and publication bias indirectness: 1, 2
    • dose response relation and publication bias indirectness imprecision: 1, 2
    • dose response relation and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2
    • dose response relation and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
    • effect estimate and publication bias indirectness: 1
    • effect estimate and publication bias indirectness imprecision: 1
    • effect estimate and study limitation: 1, 2
    • effect large magnitude and publication bias indirectness: 1, 2
    • effect large magnitude and publication bias indirectness imprecision: 1, 2
    • effect large magnitude and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2
    • effect large magnitude and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
    • Evaluation Development Recommendations Assessment grade tool and publication bias indirectness: 1