Author: Stäger, Simona; Rafati, Sima
Title: CD8(+) T Cells in Leishmania Infections: Friends or Foes? Document date: 2012_1_24
ID: uofygmeu_20
Snippet: Despite the documented evidence that CD8 + T cells strongly participate in the immune response to L. donovani and L. infantum, our recent findings suggest that L. donovani induces defective antigen-specific CD8 + T cell responses (Joshi et al., 2009 ). Interestingly, mice infected with L. donovani generate CD8 + T cell responses with limited clonal expansion. The extension of the clonal expansion is thought to be correlated with the effectiveness.....
Document: Despite the documented evidence that CD8 + T cells strongly participate in the immune response to L. donovani and L. infantum, our recent findings suggest that L. donovani induces defective antigen-specific CD8 + T cell responses (Joshi et al., 2009 ). Interestingly, mice infected with L. donovani generate CD8 + T cell responses with limited clonal expansion. The extension of the clonal expansion is thought to be correlated with the effectiveness in eliminating pathogens. It was calculated that a naïve CD8 + T cell may go through 19 cell divisions in the first week after pathogen inoculation (Badovinac et al., 2007) . Massive clonal expansions have not only been observed during viral infections, but also following the injection of irradiated Plasmodium berghei sporozoites (Sano et al., 2001) . During L. donovani infection, CD8 + T cells underwent at least 8-9 rounds of division, but failed to accumulate in the spleen (Joshi et al., 2009) . Moreover, only 10% of CD8 + T cells during clonal expansion expressed markers typically associated with end-differentiated effector cells, such as KLRG1, unpublished) . The cause of this limited expansion is yet unknown and may depend on several factors. One of the possible explanations is limited antigen availability that may result from poor antigen-processing and presentation. Processing of Leishmania antigens is thought to be confined to a TAP-independent, intraphagosomal pathway that is less efficient and requires higher amounts of antigen than the endoplasmic reticulum-based, TAP-dependent cross-presentation pathway (Bertholet et al., 2006) . Furthermore, the major surface protease of Leishmania, gp63, was shown to cleave epitopes within the parasitophorous vacuole, further reducing antigen availability (Garcia et al., 1997) . Hence, Leishmania antigens may be poorly presented and this poor presentation may not be enough to induce and sustain a massive clonal expansion of antigen-specific CD8 + T cells.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- antigen high amount and high amount: 1, 2
- antigen high amount and immune response: 1
- antigen processing and berghei sporozoite: 1
- antigen processing and cell division: 1
- antigen processing and cell response: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- antigen processing and clonal expansion: 1
- antigen processing and effector cell: 1, 2, 3, 4
- antigen processing and immune response: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- berghei sporozoite and immune response: 1
- cell division and effector cell: 1, 2
- cell division and immune response: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- cell response and clonal expansion: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- cell response and effector cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- cell response and factor depend: 1
- cell response and high amount: 1, 2
- cell response and immune response: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- clonal expansion and effector cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- clonal expansion and immune response: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- document evidence and immune response: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date