Author: Purssell, Edward; Gould, Dinah; Chudleigh, Jane
Title: Impact of isolation on hospitalised patients who are infectious: systematic review with meta-analysis Document date: 2020_2_18
ID: w05fyy4u_49
Snippet: One way of balancing the various priorities is to use the GRADE Evidence to Decision Framework, which provides criteria for making recommendations at the individual, group and policy-levels, and provides a number of highly patient focussed criteria for doing this. In addition to the certainty of evidence and resource requirements, it also requires consideration of: the balance of desirable and undesirable effects; the impact upon equity; and the .....
Document: One way of balancing the various priorities is to use the GRADE Evidence to Decision Framework, which provides criteria for making recommendations at the individual, group and policy-levels, and provides a number of highly patient focussed criteria for doing this. In addition to the certainty of evidence and resource requirements, it also requires consideration of: the balance of desirable and undesirable effects; the impact upon equity; and the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. [52] The last two of these might have very different outcomes when considered at the population and individual levels; and there is certainly evidence here that for the individual patient the balance of desirable and undesirable effects might be very different to that of the broader population. email, text and internet increased these. [53] This was not an area investigated in any depth in these studies. Another area where information may be lacking is that of age, as older people in particular might feel sadness and loneliness more; and gender, as qualitative data suggest that women in isolation were more concerned about precautions and transmission while men were more resigned, rational and tended to cope better. [54] In some countries, such as the United States single-rooms have become the standard for new hospitals and so one might expect fewer adverse effects if everyone is in a single room, this being the norm. However it may be that a single room is necessary but not sufficient for these findings, and that it is the combination of a single room with an infection that leads to these results. Certainly it is far from clear that the long list of advantages claimed for single rooms which include reduced stress, the ability to deliver better care, and a lower probability of dietary or medication errors apply to this group of patients. [55] Caring for patients in single-rooms does have many challenges, but there is evidence that these can be mitigated in a general population; [9] however the expanding literature on how this can be done in a general population does not necessarily apply here due to the necessity of isolation procedures which are, by design, 'a barrier'.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acceptability feasibility and better cope: 1, 2
- acceptability feasibility and broad population: 1
- acceptability feasibility and different outcome: 1
- acceptability feasibility and equity impact: 1, 2, 3
- acceptability feasibility and expand literature: 1
- acceptability feasibility and general population: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- acceptability feasibility and GRADE evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4
- adverse effect and different outcome: 1, 2
- adverse effect and few adverse effect: 1, 2, 3
- adverse effect and general population: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- adverse effect and GRADE evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- better cope and broad population: 1
- better cope and equity impact: 1, 2
- better cope and general population: 1, 2
- better cope and GRADE evidence: 1, 2
- broad population and equity impact: 1, 2
- broad population and general population: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- broad population and GRADE evidence: 1
- different outcome and GRADE evidence: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date