Author: Purssell, Edward; Gould, Dinah; Chudleigh, Jane
Title: Impact of isolation on hospitalised patients who are infectious: systematic review with meta-analysis Document date: 2020_2_18
ID: w05fyy4u_63
Snippet: Infection preventionists were aware that isolation could have negative effects on patients such as increased risk of anxiety, depression and falls and felt that more should be done to prevent these risks. [6] Although single rooms are assumed to reduce infection risk, evidence of ability to contain spread is equivocal [7, 8] and a recent study conducted in an all-single-room hospital was unable to demonstrate lower infection rates than in hospita.....
Document: Infection preventionists were aware that isolation could have negative effects on patients such as increased risk of anxiety, depression and falls and felt that more should be done to prevent these risks. [6] Although single rooms are assumed to reduce infection risk, evidence of ability to contain spread is equivocal [7, 8] and a recent study conducted in an all-single-room hospital was unable to demonstrate lower infection rates than in hospitals where most care takes place in open wards. [9] This study identified advantages and disadvantages of single room accommodation, whereas isolating infectious patients is generally assumed to result in adverse outcomes. [10] A systematic review reported eight years ago indicated higher levels of anxiety, depression, perceptions of stigmatisation and a higher incidence of falls, medication errors and other incidents that detract from patient safety among patients who were isolated compared to those who were not. [11] This review reported studies undertaken before 2010 and included patients whose experiences are unlikely to be comparable:
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- high level and infection rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
- high level and infection risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- high level and infection risk reduce: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- high level and infectious patient: 1, 2
- high level and low infection rate: 1, 2
- high level and negative effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- high level and open ward: 1
- high level and patient safety: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- high level and recent study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- high level and risk prevent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- high level and single room: 1, 2
- high level and spread contain: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- increase risk and infection rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41
- increase risk and infection risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76
- increase risk and infection risk reduce: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- increase risk and infectious patient: 1
- increase risk and low infection rate: 1, 2
- increase risk and negative effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- increase risk and patient safety: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date