Author: Jang, Won Mo; Kim, Un-Na; Jang, Deok Hyun; Jung, Hyemin; Cho, Sanghyun; Eun, Sang Jun; Lee, Jin Yong
Title: Influence of trust on two different risk perceptions as an affective and cognitive dimension during Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea: serial cross-sectional surveys Document date: 2020_3_4
ID: xpwox6of_95
Snippet: ï¬ This study could not confirm causal relationship between personal characteristics and risk perception due to the limitation of the cross-sectional study design. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 During contagious disease epidemics, perceived risk can hav.....
Document: ï¬ This study could not confirm causal relationship between personal characteristics and risk perception due to the limitation of the cross-sectional study design. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 During contagious disease epidemics, perceived risk can have a significant impact on precautionary behaviors that might affect disease transmission. [10] [11] [12] A relevant empirical study emphasized that informing public about the disease outbreak, such as the Ebola virus, could reduce worry about contracting the virus and take more preventive measures. 13 The evaluation of public risk perception of disease helps us to know what knowledge the public needs.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- preventive measure and risk perception: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- preventive measure and significant impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- preventive measure and study design: 1
- public disease risk perception and relevant empirical study: 1
- public disease risk perception and risk perception: 1, 2
- public disease risk perception and significant impact: 1
- public disease risk perception and study design: 1
- public need and risk perception: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- public need and significant impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- public need and study design: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
- public need and virus contract: 1
- relevant empirical study and risk perception: 1
- relevant empirical study and significant impact: 1
- relevant empirical study and study design: 1
- risk perception and significant impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- risk perception and study design: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38
- risk perception and virus contract: 1, 2
- significant impact and study design: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- study design and virus contract: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date