Author: Jang, Won Mo; Kim, Un-Na; Jang, Deok Hyun; Jung, Hyemin; Cho, Sanghyun; Eun, Sang Jun; Lee, Jin Yong
Title: Influence of trust on two different risk perceptions as an affective and cognitive dimension during Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea: serial cross-sectional surveys Document date: 2020_3_4
ID: xpwox6of_98
Snippet: Most people may not conduct deliberate risk analysis when they cope with lack of knowledge about risk, such as new disease outbreak, but rely on simple heuristics. 18 19 Heuristic processing can be understood as simple decision rule of thumb or mental shortcut that can reduce the complexity of decision making. When risk management decisions are needed, trust in the institutions can be used as one of the heuristics. 20 People having trust in the r.....
Document: Most people may not conduct deliberate risk analysis when they cope with lack of knowledge about risk, such as new disease outbreak, but rely on simple heuristics. 18 19 Heuristic processing can be understood as simple decision rule of thumb or mental shortcut that can reduce the complexity of decision making. When risk management decisions are needed, trust in the institutions can be used as one of the heuristics. 20 People having trust in the responsible risk manager, such as the government, may perceive less risk in a particular situation than people not having trust. 21 22 Regarding the MERS epidemic in South Korea, less trust in the government affected increasing number of individuals` risk perception. [23] [24] [25] Trust is known to be related not only to cognitive risk perception but also to affective risk perception. 26 27 However, when assessing the influence of trust in risk perception, many studies have not distinguished between affective and cognitive reaction regarding contagious diseases during outbreaks. 3 12 23 24 28-30 We hypothesized that (1) affective risk perception would increase and decrease faster than cognitive risk perception over time and that (2) low trust in government would be related with high risk perception (both affective and cognitive).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- affective risk perception and cognitive affective risk perception: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- affective risk perception and cognitive risk perception: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- affective risk perception and cognitive time risk perception: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- affective risk perception and cognitive time risk perception faster decrease: 1
- affective risk perception and decision making: 1
- affective risk perception and decision making complexity: 1
- affective risk perception and decision making complexity reduce: 1
- affective risk perception and decision rule: 1
- affective risk perception and deliberate risk analysis: 1
- affective risk perception and deliberate risk analysis conduct: 1
- affective risk perception and disease outbreak: 1
- affective risk perception and government low trust: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- affective risk perception and government responsible risk manager: 1, 2, 3
- affective risk perception and government trust: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- affective risk perception and heuristic processing: 1
- affective risk perception and high cognitive affective risk perception: 1
- cognitive affective reaction and government trust: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- cognitive affective reaction and heuristic processing: 1
- cognitive affective reaction and high cognitive affective risk perception: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date