Author: Ye, Sheng; Wang, Tianlin
Title: Laboratory epidemiology of respiratory viruses in a large children's hospital: A STROBE-compliant article Document date: 2018_7_27
ID: s6hkr5un_12
Snippet: In multivariable logistic regression analysis, age was independently associated with positive result for adenovirus (Table 5) . With 1 year increase in age, the odds of positive result increased by 2% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.04; P = .001). Male gender was associated with higher risk of positive for adenovirus (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.20; P = .017). The type of sample was not significantly associated with posi.....
Document: In multivariable logistic regression analysis, age was independently associated with positive result for adenovirus (Table 5) . With 1 year increase in age, the odds of positive result increased by 2% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.04; P = .001). Male gender was associated with higher risk of positive for adenovirus (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.20; P = .017). The type of sample was not significantly associated with positive result. As compared with the autumn, samples collected in the summer were more likely to be positive for adenovirus (OR: 14.48; 95% CI: 12.17-17.34; P < .001), whereas the winter was associated with lower risk of positive result (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.97; P = .018). For the test of influenza A (Table 6) , age was independently associated with positive result. With 1 year increase in age, the odds of positive result increased by 12% (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.11-1.13; P < .001). Male gender was not associated with risk of positive results. Samples obtained by throat swab was less likely to report positive result for influenza A (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62-0.76; P < .001). As compared with the autumn, samples obtained in summer were more likely to be positive for influenza A (OR: 0.06; 95% CI: 0.02-0.12; P < .001), whereas the winter was associated Comparing baseline characteristics of samples tested negative and positive for adenovirus. Note: there were 4 samples with missing values on the results. They were counted in the total column, but not counted in the negative and positive columns. In winter, the samples were more likely to be positive for influenza A (0.72 vs 0.37; P < .001). Sputum samples were more likely to be positive for influenza A (0.82 vs 0.75; P < .001). Table 3 Comparing baseline characteristics of samples tested negative and positive for influenza B virus.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- logistic regression analysis and male gender: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45
- logistic regression analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- logistic regression analysis and odd ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- logistic regression analysis and positive high risk: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression analysis and positive negative column: 1
- logistic regression analysis and positive negative test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- logistic regression analysis and positive result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- logistic regression analysis and sample type: 1, 2, 3, 4
- logistic regression and low risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- logistic regression and male gender: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- logistic regression and multivariable logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- logistic regression and odd ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39
- logistic regression and positive high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- logistic regression and positive negative column: 1
- logistic regression and positive negative test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39
- logistic regression and positive result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- logistic regression and positive result risk: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression and sample type: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- logistic regression and total column: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date