Selected article for: "developed country and low income"
Author: Milne, George J; Baskaran, Pravin; Halder, Nilimesh; Karl, Stephan; Kelso, Joel
Title: Pandemic influenza in Papua New Guinea: a modelling study comparison with pandemic spread in a developed country
  • Document date: 2013_3_26
    • ID: y01w04lc_297
    Snippet: Conclusions This study provides further evidence that an influenza pandemic occurring in a low-income country such as PNG may have a greater impact than one occurring in a developed country, and that PNG-feasible interventions may be substantially less effective. The larger average household size in PNG, the larger proportion of the population under 18 and greater community-wide contact all contribute to this feature. Strength and limitations of .....
    Document: Conclusions This study provides further evidence that an influenza pandemic occurring in a low-income country such as PNG may have a greater impact than one occurring in a developed country, and that PNG-feasible interventions may be substantially less effective. The larger average household size in PNG, the larger proportion of the population under 18 and greater community-wide contact all contribute to this feature. Strength and limitations of this study The findings are a first step in understanding how an influenza pandemic will impact on a low-income country.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • influenza pandemic low income country impact and low income country: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • influenza pandemic low income country impact and low income country impact: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • influenza pandemic low income country impact and PNG household size: 1, 2
    • influenza pandemic low income country impact and PNG low income country: 1, 2
    • large proportion and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • large proportion and low income country: 1
    • large proportion and population large proportion: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75
    • low income and png feasible intervention: 1
    • low income and PNG household size: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • low income and PNG low income country: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • low income and PNG low income country occurring: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • low income and population large proportion: 1, 2, 3
    • low income country and PNG household size: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • low income country and PNG low income country: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • low income country and PNG low income country occurring: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • low income country and population large proportion: 1
    • low income country impact and PNG household size: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • low income country impact and PNG low income country: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • low income country impact and PNG low income country occurring: 1, 2, 3, 4