Selected article for: "Asia Pacific LMICs PHC service organisation and evidence gap"
Author: Palagyi, Anna; Dodd, Rebecca; Jan, Stephen; Nambiar, Devaki; Joshi, Rohina; Tian, Maoyi; Abimbola, Seye; Peiris, David
Title: Organisation of primary health care in the Asia-Pacific region: developing a prioritised research agenda
  • Document date: 2019_8_16
    • ID: zjsjgd31_32
    Snippet: A fuTure reSeArCH AgendA Notwithstanding the limitations described, based on our analysis of evidence gaps and stakeholder priorities we propose the following pragmatic approach to five focus areas for future research to improve the organisation of PHC service delivery in LMICs of the Asia-Pacific region. While each country represents a unique context, there was sufficient convergence between the evidence gap analysis and research priorities of t.....
    Document: A fuTure reSeArCH AgendA Notwithstanding the limitations described, based on our analysis of evidence gaps and stakeholder priorities we propose the following pragmatic approach to five focus areas for future research to improve the organisation of PHC service delivery in LMICs of the Asia-Pacific region. While each country represents a unique context, there was sufficient convergence between the evidence gap analysis and research priorities of the Delphi panel members (table 2) to suggest LMICs face common challenges in strengthening their PHC systems, and that these challenges should inform both national and regional-level research agendas.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Asia Pacific region and common challenge face: 1
    • Asia Pacific region and evidence gap: 1
    • Asia Pacific region and future research: 1, 2, 3
    • Asia Pacific region and PHC system: 1, 2, 3
    • Asia Pacific region and regional level: 1
    • common challenge and future research: 1
    • common challenge and regional level: 1
    • evidence gap analysis and PHC system: 1
    • evidence gap and focus area: 1
    • evidence gap and future research: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • evidence gap and PHC system: 1, 2
    • evidence gap and pragmatic approach: 1
    • focus area and future research: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • focus area and future research focus area: 1, 2, 3
    • focus area and PHC system: 1
    • future research and PHC system: 1, 2, 3
    • future research and pragmatic approach: 1
    • future research and regional level: 1, 2, 3