Selected article for: "close contact and household close contact"

Author: Milne, George J; Baskaran, Pravin; Halder, Nilimesh; Karl, Stephan; Kelso, Joel
Title: Pandemic influenza in Papua New Guinea: a modelling study comparison with pandemic spread in a developed country
  • Document date: 2013_3_26
  • ID: y01w04lc_325
    Snippet: Individuals in each household and contact hub make contacts within a close-contact mixing group, taken to be the entire household or a subset of larger hubs, and also make additional non hub-based random community contacts. The individual-toindividual transmission probability in larger households was moderated by household size using data from a study by Cauchemez et al [42] . The reduction of the probability of within-household transmission with.....
    Document: Individuals in each household and contact hub make contacts within a close-contact mixing group, taken to be the entire household or a subset of larger hubs, and also make additional non hub-based random community contacts. The individual-toindividual transmission probability in larger households was moderated by household size using data from a study by Cauchemez et al [42] . The reduction of the probability of within-household transmission with household size is also shown in Figure A1 in the Supplementary Data File. This reflects the assumed reduction in pairwise contact in households with greater than 3 members and is significant in the Madang context, where the average household size is 6.32 compared to 2.54 in Albany.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Albany compare and household size: 1
    • assumed reduction and average household size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • assumed reduction and close contact: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • assumed reduction and close contact mixing group: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • assumed reduction and contact hub: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • assumed reduction and contact hub household: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • assumed reduction and entire household: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • assumed reduction and household size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • assumed reduction and household size household transmission: 1, 2
    • assumed reduction and household size household transmission probability: 1, 2
    • assumed reduction and household size household transmission probability reduction: 1
    • assumed reduction and household transmission: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • assumed reduction and individual toindividual: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • average household size and close contact: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • average household size and contact hub: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • average household size and contact hub household: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • average household size and entire household: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • average household size and household size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • average household size and household size household transmission: 1, 2