Selected article for: "isoelectric lead method and QRS complex"

Title: RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS OF THE 28th ECVIM-CA CONGRESS
  • Document date: 2018_12_19
  • ID: r79h9yzz_762
    Snippet: Standard 6‐leads ECGs were retrospectively analysed from the clinical database of the Istituto Veterinario of Novara. MEA of the QRS complex was calculated with the isoelectric lead method. A total of 1333 dogs were included. IQRS axis was identified in 8/1333 dogs, with an overall prevalence of 0.6%. Among the 8 dogs presenting iQRS axis, 6 did not have any cardio‐structural abnormality, and the remaining 2 dogs had severe right ventricular .....
    Document: Standard 6‐leads ECGs were retrospectively analysed from the clinical database of the Istituto Veterinario of Novara. MEA of the QRS complex was calculated with the isoelectric lead method. A total of 1333 dogs were included. IQRS axis was identified in 8/1333 dogs, with an overall prevalence of 0.6%. Among the 8 dogs presenting iQRS axis, 6 did not have any cardio‐structural abnormality, and the remaining 2 dogs had severe right ventricular enlargement secondary to pulmonic stenosis (n=1) and tricuspid valve dysplasia (n=1). Among healthy dogs presenting iQRS axis, 6/6 (100%) had a deep‐chested thoracic morphotype. No significant differences were found between dogs with and without iQRS axis regarding age (4.3 years, range 1‐12 years versus 9.1 years, range 2‐13 years; P=0.171) and body weight (24 kg, range 13‐29 kg versus 21 kg, range 23‐34 kg; P=0.646).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • body weight and thoracic morphotype: 1
    • body weight and year range: 1, 2
    • clinical database and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • clinical database and year range: 1
    • dog identify and significant difference: 1
    • healthy dog and significant difference: 1
    • isoelectric lead method and standard ecg: 1
    • lead method and significant difference: 1
    • lead method and standard ecg: 1
    • overall prevalence and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • overall prevalence and year range: 1
    • pulmonic stenosis and tricuspid valve dysplasia pulmonic stenosis: 1
    • QRS complex and significant difference: 1
    • QRS complex and standard ecg: 1, 2
    • QRS complex and thoracic morphotype: 1
    • QRS complex mea and thoracic morphotype: 1
    • right ventricular enlargement and thoracic morphotype: 1
    • significant difference and standard ecg: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • significant difference and year range: 1, 2