Selected article for: "education level and low income"

Author: Robledo-Aceves, Mireya; Moreno-Peregrina, María de Jesús; Velarde-Rivera, Fernando; Ascencio-Esparza, Elba; Preciado-Figueroa, Francisco M.; Caniza, Miguela A.; Escobedo-Melendez, Griselda
Title: Risk factors for severe bronchiolitis caused by respiratory virus infections among Mexican children in an emergency department
  • Document date: 2018_3_2
  • ID: uzuwqy3g_35
    Snippet: Finally, we found that having a complete schedule of vaccinations was a protective factor to prevent severe viral bronchiolitis in infants and young children. This could be a surrogate factor linked to better socioeconomic status and better life habits, as less tobacco smoke, less crowding, or better medical assistance. However, socioeconomic status or parent's level of education was not possible to compare between patients and controls because t.....
    Document: Finally, we found that having a complete schedule of vaccinations was a protective factor to prevent severe viral bronchiolitis in infants and young children. This could be a surrogate factor linked to better socioeconomic status and better life habits, as less tobacco smoke, less crowding, or better medical assistance. However, socioeconomic status or parent's level of education was not possible to compare between patients and controls because this information was missing in the majority of the cases, being a limiting of our study. In Mexico, the Ministry of Health provides the seasonal flu vaccines to all children older than 1 year, but vaccination against RSV is not available to date. Although this protective association does not explain the decreased incidence of severe bronchiolitis among vaccinated children, it is important to note that these data reflect that the healthy control group had better health care, including vaccinations against preventable infections. Pregnancy history factors, such as adequate prenatal care and taking calcium during pregnancy, were protective factors for severe viral bronchiolitis in this study. Although a previous report did not find these factors protective, [24] studies in low-income populations should be done to more thoroughly investigate these protective associations.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • adequate prenatal care and health care: 1
    • adequate prenatal care and healthy control group: 1
    • adequate prenatal care and low income: 1
    • better socioeconomic status and low income: 1, 2
    • case majority and health care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • case majority and low income: 1, 2
    • complete schedule and education level: 1
    • control group and decrease incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • control group and education level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • control group and health care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • control group and healthy control group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • control group and history factor: 1, 2
    • control group and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • control patient and decrease incidence: 1
    • control patient and education level: 1, 2
    • control patient and health care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • control patient and healthy control group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • control patient and history factor: 1
    • control patient and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6