Selected article for: "factor model and scoring method"
Author: Hashimoto, Kojiro; Sugawara, Norio; Tanaka, Osamu; Nakamura, Kazuhiko; Yasui-Furukori, Norio
Title: Parental bonding and attitudes toward suicide among medical college students in Japan
  • Document date: 2014_10_23
    • ID: y74no5kq_8
    Snippet: We employed the Japanese version of the Attitudes Toward Suicide questionnaire (ATTS) to assess the attitudes toward suicide held by the study participants. 12 We employed a six factor model that was previously developed in studies of Japanese attitudes, including "right to suicide", "common occurrence", "suicidal expression as mere threat", "unjustified behavior", "preventability/readiness to help", and "impulsiveness". 12, 13 Each item, with th.....
    Document: We employed the Japanese version of the Attitudes Toward Suicide questionnaire (ATTS) to assess the attitudes toward suicide held by the study participants. 12 We employed a six factor model that was previously developed in studies of Japanese attitudes, including "right to suicide", "common occurrence", "suicidal expression as mere threat", "unjustified behavior", "preventability/readiness to help", and "impulsiveness". 12, 13 Each item, with the exception of items 10 and 28, was scored on a five point scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Items 10 and 28 were scored using a different scoring method that employed a five point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Lower sub-scale scores indicate a stronger agreement with the factor.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • common occurrence and preventability help readiness: 1
    • common occurrence suicide and help readiness: 1
    • common occurrence suicide and preventability help readiness: 1
    • common occurrence suicide right and help readiness: 1
    • common occurrence suicide right and preventability help readiness: 1
    • factor model and japanese version: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • factor model and point scale: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • factor model and scoring method: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • help readiness and preventability help readiness: 1
    • point scale and scoring method: 1
    • point scale and strong agreement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • point scale and strongly agree: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25