Selected article for: "multiple test correction and test correction"

Author: Thornton, Hannah V; Hay, Alastair D; Redmond, Niamh M; Turnbull, Sophie L; Christensen, Hannah; Peters, Tim J; Leeming, John P; Lovering, Andrew; Vipond, Barry; Muir, Peter; Blair, Peter S
Title: Throat swabs in children with respiratory tract infection: associations with clinical presentation and potential targets for point-of-care testing
  • Document date: 2017_2_18
  • ID: r3fzwy00_18
    Snippet: In the follow-up study, we compared detection rates of (i) ≥1RTIrelated bacteria and (ii) ≥1RTI-related virus between samples taken at baseline (symptomatic) and follow-up (asymptomatic) consultations. We also compared detection rates of individual microbes at each visit (microbes with baseline consultation prevalence ≥5% only). A Bonferroni correction was applied due to multiple comparisons, with resultant test-wise significance level of 0.....
    Document: In the follow-up study, we compared detection rates of (i) ≥1RTIrelated bacteria and (ii) ≥1RTI-related virus between samples taken at baseline (symptomatic) and follow-up (asymptomatic) consultations. We also compared detection rates of individual microbes at each visit (microbes with baseline consultation prevalence ≥5% only). A Bonferroni correction was applied due to multiple comparisons, with resultant test-wise significance level of 0.005. Analysis was conducted in STATA v14 (StataCorp. 2015).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Bonferroni correction and significance level: 1, 2, 3
    • detection rate and follow study: 1, 2
    • detection rate and significance level: 1, 2
    • follow study and multiple comparison: 1
    • follow study and significance level: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • multiple comparison and significance level: 1