Author: Thornton, Hannah V; Hay, Alastair D; Redmond, Niamh M; Turnbull, Sophie L; Christensen, Hannah; Peters, Tim J; Leeming, John P; Lovering, Andrew; Vipond, Barry; Muir, Peter; Blair, Peter S
Title: Throat swabs in children with respiratory tract infection: associations with clinical presentation and potential targets for point-of-care testing Document date: 2017_2_18
ID: r3fzwy00_43
Snippet: Continued along with recruitment of children who did not receive antibiotics, removed as far as possible any confounding effects of factors such as children's age, siblings, daycare attendance, household deprivation (14) and antimicrobial prescribing on microbe detection. These analyses should be regarded as exploratory; their multiplicity increases the risk of Type I error. We used adjusted p-values to reduce this risk, but if we were too string.....
Document: Continued along with recruitment of children who did not receive antibiotics, removed as far as possible any confounding effects of factors such as children's age, siblings, daycare attendance, household deprivation (14) and antimicrobial prescribing on microbe detection. These analyses should be regarded as exploratory; their multiplicity increases the risk of Type I error. We used adjusted p-values to reduce this risk, but if we were too stringent in this, we may have introduced Type II errors. Specific prior hypotheses regarding the associations explored would have helped target the analysis, but the absence of prior evidence in this area meant that this was necessarily an exploratory study. Additionally, the sample size of the follow-up study was not large enough to detect whether what appeared to be important variation in detection was in fact due to chance, and the low response rate may have led to a biased sample.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- follow study and prior evidence: 1
- follow study and response rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- follow study and risk reduce: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- follow study and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
- follow study sample size and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- important variation and response rate: 1, 2, 3
- important variation and sample size: 1
- low response rate and response rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44
- low response rate and sample size: 1, 2, 3
- prior evidence and risk reduce: 1, 2
- prior evidence and sample size: 1, 2
- response rate and risk reduce: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- response rate and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45
- response rate and Type II error: 1
- risk reduce and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
- sample size and Type II error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date