Selected article for: "NK cell and type ifn"

Author: Madera, Sharline; Rapp, Moritz; Firth, Matthew A.; Beilke, Joshua N.; Lanier, Lewis L.; Sun, Joseph C.
Title: Type I IFN promotes NK cell expansion during viral infection by protecting NK cells against fratricide
  • Document date: 2016_2_8
  • ID: qkdni38b_5
    Snippet: Type I IFN has both direct and indirect effects on NK cell development and maturation (Mizutani et al., 2012; Guan et al., 2014) . In accordance with these prior studies, resting splenic NK cells from Ifnar −/− mice exhibited an increase in immature NK cells as indicated by CD27, CD11b, and KLRG1 expression when compared with WT (unpublished data). Thus, we generated mixed WT :Ifnar − /− bone marrow chimeras in which development of Ifnar .....
    Document: Type I IFN has both direct and indirect effects on NK cell development and maturation (Mizutani et al., 2012; Guan et al., 2014) . In accordance with these prior studies, resting splenic NK cells from Ifnar −/− mice exhibited an increase in immature NK cells as indicated by CD27, CD11b, and KLRG1 expression when compared with WT (unpublished data). Thus, we generated mixed WT :Ifnar − /− bone marrow chimeras in which development of Ifnar −/− NK cells appeared grossly normal (unpublished data) and investigated the role of type I IFNs on the NK cell response against MCMV infection. At day 1.5 after MCMV infection, Ifnar −/− NK cells in mixed chimeric mice exhibited defective up-regulation of CD69 (Fig. 3 A) , a marker of activation downstream of type I IFN signaling (Gerosa et al., 1991) . Ifnar −/− NK cells also failed to up-regulate granzyme B compared with their WT counterparts at day 1.5 PI (Fig. 3 B) , consistent with a previous study (Baranek et al., 2012) . Interestingly, Ifnar −/− NK cells produced more IFN-γ than WT NK cells at day 1.5 PI (Fig. 3 B) . STAT1 phosphorylation was completely ablated in NK cells that cannot sense type I IFNs (Fig. 3 C) . These findings demonstrate the ability of type I IFNs to directly impact the expression of key effector molecules in NK cells, likely via robust STAT1 phosphorylation.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • activation downstream and cell response: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • activation downstream and ifn type: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • activation downstream and previous study: 1, 2
    • activation downstream and STAT1 phosphorylation: 1
    • activation downstream and type activation downstream: 1, 2
    • cell development and ifn type: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • cell development and Ifnar bone: 1
    • cell development and maturation NK cell development: 1, 2
    • cell development and mcmv infection: 1, 2
    • cell development and nk cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • cell development and NK cell development: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • cell development and PI day: 1
    • cell development and previous study: 1, 2, 3
    • cell development and prior study: 1
    • cell response and effector molecule: 1
    • cell response and ifn type: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71
    • cell response and ifn type ability: 1
    • cell response and ifn type role: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • cell response and mcmv infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5