Author: Choi, Won Suk; Kang, Cheol-In; Kim, Yonjae; Choi, Jae-Phil; Joh, Joon Sung; Shin, Hyoung-Shik; Kim, Gayeon; Peck, Kyong Ran; Chung, Doo Ryeon; Kim, Hye Ok; Song, Sook Hee; Kim, Yang Ree; Sohn, Kyung Mok; Jung, Younghee; Bang, Ji Hwan; Kim, Nam Joong; Lee, Kkot Sil; Jeong, Hye Won; Rhee, Ji-Young; Kim, Eu Suk; Woo, Heungjeong; Oh, Won Sup; Huh, Kyungmin; Lee, Young Hyun; Song, Joon Young; Lee, Jacob; Lee, Chang-Seop; Kim, Baek-Nam; Choi, Young Hwa; Jeong, Su Jin; Lee, Jin-Soo; Yoon, Ji Hyun; Wi, Yu Mi; Joung, Mi Kyong; Park, Seong Yeon; Lee, Sun Hee; Jung, Sook-In; Kim, Shin-Woo; Lee, Jae Hoon; Lee, Hyuck; Ki, Hyun Kyun; Kim, Yeon-Sook
Title: Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in the Republic of Korea Document date: 2016_6_30
ID: pztrwvib_10
Snippet: Collected data were categorized with respect to demographics, clinical symptoms, comorbidities, laboratory test results, image findings, treatments performed, and clinical outcomes. We carried out descriptive analysis for the aforementioned categories. Continuous variables were reported as means with standard deviations or medians with ranges. For categorical variables, the proportion of patients was calculated for each variable. Comparison analy.....
Document: Collected data were categorized with respect to demographics, clinical symptoms, comorbidities, laboratory test results, image findings, treatments performed, and clinical outcomes. We carried out descriptive analysis for the aforementioned categories. Continuous variables were reported as means with standard deviations or medians with ranges. For categorical variables, the proportion of patients was calculated for each variable. Comparison analysis for subgroups was performed using Student's t-test, Pearson's chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, and Cox-regression analysis was also performed to evaluate risk factors of mortality. For Cox-regression analysis, the data was censored at September 30, 2015 for survivors. A P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All analysis was performed with SPSS software (SPSS version 20.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- categorical variable and clinical outcome: 1
- categorical variable and continuous variable: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- categorical variable and Cox regression: 1
- categorical variable and descriptive analysis: 1
- categorical variable and exact test: 1, 2, 3, 4
- chi square test and clinical outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- chi square test and clinical symptom: 1, 2
- chi square test and comparison analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
- chi square test and continuous variable: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- chi square test and Cox regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- chi square test and cox regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- chi square test and descriptive analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- chi square test and exact test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- chi square test and Fisher exact test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- clinical outcome and comparison analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
- clinical outcome and continuous variable: 1
- clinical outcome and Cox regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- clinical outcome and cox regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- clinical outcome and descriptive analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date